1197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19324328)
1. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Totally implantable venous access ports: frequency of complications and analysis of bacterial contamination after ablation].
Barbut F; Soukouna S; Lalande V; Garcia ML; Neyme D; de Gramont A; Petit JC
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2004 Dec; 52(10):566-74. PubMed ID: 15596304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
Chen PT; Sung CS; Wang CC; Chan KH; Chang WK; Hsu WH
J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].
Albo López C; López Rodríguez D; Constenla Camba MI; Jimenéz Blanco A; Araujo LF; García-Medina J
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Jun; 44(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10481577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conversion from cephalic vein to external jugular vein: success rate increased on totally implantable access ports with cut-down method.
Lin CH; Yu JC; Lee YT; Wu HS
Surg Innov; 2013 Dec; 20(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 23445713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) needs improvement: a multivariate analysis of 400 patients.
Seiler CM; Frohlich BE; Dorsam UJ; Kienle P; Buchler MW; Knaebel HP
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jan; 93(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 16353193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term complications in totally implantable venous access devices: randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein puncture.
Ribeiro RC; Abib SC; Aguiar AS; Schettini ST
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2012 Feb; 58(2):274-7. PubMed ID: 21674765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The complications of the use of hemodialysis catheters in central veins of the upper part of body--own experience].
Wojcieszek E; Misiołek H; Kucia H; Karpe J; Kadela J; Werszner M
Wiad Lek; 2002; 55(3-4):197-205. PubMed ID: 12182005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre.
Narducci F; Jean-Laurent M; Boulanger L; El Bédoui S; Mallet Y; Houpeau JL; Hamdani A; Penel N; Fournier C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 37(10):913-8. PubMed ID: 21831566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metastasis over implantable venous access ports.
Lee CH; Day AS; Hwang TZ
Head Neck; 2013 Oct; 35(10):E314-6. PubMed ID: 22972674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].
Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Learning curve and early complications of totally implantable venous access devices: is tutoring the solution for the problem?].
Di Carlo I; Toro A; Sofia M; Fasone MA; Barbagallo F; Russello D
G Chir; 2004 Apr; 25(4):146-8. PubMed ID: 15283408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.
Biffi R; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Pace U; Bonomo G; Monfardini L; Della Vigna P; Rotmensz N; Radice D; Zampino MG; Fazio N; de Braud F; Andreoni B; Goldhirsch A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 19179550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
