256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19324609)
1. Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.
Harris WE; Uller T
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 364(1520):1039-48. PubMed ID: 19324609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential Allocation Revisited: When Should Mate Quality Affect Parental Investment?
Haaland TR; Wright J; Kuijper B; Ratikainen II
Am Nat; 2017 Oct; 190(4):534-546. PubMed ID: 28937815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Females allocate differentially to offspring size and number in response to male effects on female and offspring fitness.
Kindsvater HK; Alonzo SH
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Mar; 281(1779):20131981. PubMed ID: 24478292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential allocation in a lekking bird: females lay larger eggs and are more likely to have male chicks when they mate with less related males.
Sardell RJ; DuVal EH
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jan; 281(1774):20132386. PubMed ID: 24225457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Female differential allocation in response to extrapair offspring and social mate attractiveness.
Wilson KM; Burley NT
Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(12):7278-7291. PubMed ID: 34188812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies.
Barrett LT; Evans JP; Gasparini C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93780. PubMed ID: 24705713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No evidence for adjustment of maternal investment under alternative mate availability regimes.
Weigel EG; Tinghitella RM; Boughman JW
J Fish Biol; 2016 Feb; 88(2):508-22. PubMed ID: 26508506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of mate preference and laying order on maternal allocation in a monogamous parrot species with extreme hatching asynchrony.
Lahaye SE; Eens M; Iserbyt A; Groothuis TG; de Vries B; Müller W; Pinxten R
Horm Behav; 2015 May; 71():49-59. PubMed ID: 25870020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The better, the choosier: A meta-analysis on interindividual variation of male mate choice.
Pollo P; Nakagawa S; Kasumovic MM
Ecol Lett; 2022 May; 25(5):1305-1322. PubMed ID: 35259282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deadbeats or losers: Discretionary male parental investment can make females less choosy.
Meacham F; Getty T
J Theor Biol; 2017 Jun; 422():50-58. PubMed ID: 28414086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mate choice in Mus musculus is relative and dependent on the estrous state.
Zinck L; Lima SQ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66064. PubMed ID: 23762466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential allocation of parental investment and the trade-off between size and number of offspring.
Ratikainen II; Haaland TR; Wright J
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Aug; 285(1884):. PubMed ID: 30068679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential allocation in a gift-giving spider: males adjust their reproductive investment in response to female condition.
Solano-Brenes D; Costa-Schmidt LE; Albo MJ; Machado G
BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):140. PubMed ID: 34238218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
Kokko H; Jennions MD
J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive effort and success of males in scramble-competition polygyny: Evidence for trade-offs between foraging and mate search.
Foley AM; Hewitt DG; DeYoung RW; Schnupp MJ; Hellickson MW; Lockwood MA
J Anim Ecol; 2018 Nov; 87(6):1600-1614. PubMed ID: 30079548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facultative adjustment of the offspring sex ratio and male attractiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Booksmythe I; Mautz B; Davis J; Nakagawa S; Jennions MD
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Feb; 92(1):108-134. PubMed ID: 26405787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
