These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19324990)

  • 21. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
    du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
    Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Genomic abnormalities in children with mental retardation and autism: the use of comparative genomic hybridization in situ (HRCGH) and molecular karyotyping with DNA-microchips (array CGH)].
    Vorsanova SG; Iurov IIu; Kurinnaia OS; Voinova VIu; Iurov IuB
    Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 2013; 113(8):46-9. PubMed ID: 24077551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical applications of BAC array-CGH to the study of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.
    Robledo C; García JL; Hernández JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 973():121-45. PubMed ID: 23412787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detecting sex chromosome anomalies and common triploidies in products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Ballif BC; Kashork CD; Saleki R; Rorem E; Sundin K; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Apr; 26(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 16491513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
    Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Integration of microarray analysis into the clinical diagnosis of hematological malignancies: How much can we improve cytogenetic testing?
    Peterson JF; Aggarwal N; Smith CA; Gollin SM; Surti U; Rajkovic A; Swerdlow SH; Yatsenko SA
    Oncotarget; 2015 Aug; 6(22):18845-62. PubMed ID: 26299921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects: high detection rates by using chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Lu XY; Phung MT; Shaw CA; Pham K; Neil SE; Patel A; Sahoo T; Bacino CA; Stankiewicz P; Kang SH; Lalani S; Chinault AC; Lupski JR; Cheung SW; Beaudet AL
    Pediatrics; 2008 Dec; 122(6):1310-8. PubMed ID: 19047251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hillman SC; Pretlove S; Coomarasamy A; McMullan DJ; Davison EV; Maher ER; Kilby MD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20658510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
    Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
    Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnosis of copy number variation by Illumina next generation sequencing is comparable in performance to oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridisation.
    Hayes JL; Tzika A; Thygesen H; Berri S; Wood HM; Hewitt S; Pendlebury M; Coates A; Willoughby L; Watson CM; Rabbitts P; Roberts P; Taylor GR
    Genomics; 2013 Sep; 102(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 23598253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.
    Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Piper J; Isola J; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Aug; 10(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 7522536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Customized high resolution CGH-array for clinical diagnosis reveals additional genomic imbalances in previous well-defined pathological samples.
    Vallespín E; Palomares Bralo M; Mori MÁ; Martín R; García-Miñaúr S; Fernández L; de Torres ML; García-Santiago F; Mansilla E; Santos F; M-Montaño VE; Crespo MC; Martín S; Martínez-Glez V; Delicado A; Lapunzina P; Nevado J
    Am J Med Genet A; 2013 Aug; 161A(8):1950-60. PubMed ID: 23798500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rapid high-resolution mapping of balanced chromosomal rearrangements on tiling CGH arrays.
    Greisman HA; Hoffman NG; Yi HS
    J Mol Diagn; 2011 Nov; 13(6):621-33. PubMed ID: 21907824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-resolution molecular characterization of 15q11-q13 rearrangements by array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) with detection of gene dosage.
    Wang NJ; Liu D; Parokonny AS; Schanen NC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Aug; 75(2):267-81. PubMed ID: 15197683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Detection of the Cytogenetic Aberrations in Multiple Myeloma by Using Microrray Comparative Genomic Hybridization].
    Wang YF; Wang H; Xi LY; Zhang ZH; Wang J; Dong F; Ke XY
    Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 26(5):1389-1395. PubMed ID: 30295256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Oligonucleotide arrays vs. metaphase-comparative genomic hybridisation and BAC arrays for single-cell analysis: first applications to preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Robertsonian translocation carriers.
    Ramos L; del Rey J; Daina G; García-Aragonés M; Armengol L; Fernandez-Encinas A; Parriego M; Boada M; Martinez-Passarell O; Martorell MR; Casagran O; Benet J; Navarro J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113223. PubMed ID: 25415307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative genomic hybridization using oligonucleotide microarrays and total genomic DNA.
    Barrett MT; Scheffer A; Ben-Dor A; Sampas N; Lipson D; Kincaid R; Tsang P; Curry B; Baird K; Meltzer PS; Yakhini Z; Bruhn L; Laderman S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Dec; 101(51):17765-70. PubMed ID: 15591353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microarray comparative genomic hybridization detection of chromosomal imbalances in uterine cervix carcinoma.
    Hidalgo A; Baudis M; Petersen I; Arreola H; Piña P; Vázquez-Ortiz G; Hernández D; González J; Lazos M; López R; Pérez C; García J; Vázquez K; Alatorre B; Salcedo M
    BMC Cancer; 2005 Jul; 5():77. PubMed ID: 16004614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High frequency of common DNA copy number abnormalities detected by bacterial artificial chromosome array comparative genomic hybridization in 24 breast cancer cell lines.
    Saito S; Morita K; Hirano T
    Hum Cell; 2009 Feb; 22(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19222606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.