These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19326057)

  • 1. [Clinical studies beyond the German Drug Law. Studies for evaluating diagnostic tests].
    Abel U; Jensen K
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Apr; 52(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 19326057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence and clinical utility.
    Honig PK
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Apr; 89(4):488-9; author reply 489-90. PubMed ID: 21346751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The benefit of diagnostic tests--from surrogate endpoints to patient-relevant endpoints].
    Janatzek S
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(7):504-9. PubMed ID: 21958609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
    Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the biomarker pipeline to develop and evaluate cancer screening tests.
    Baker SG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Aug; 101(16):1116-9. PubMed ID: 19574417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical trials with minors in Germany--effects of the 12th amendment to the German Drug Code on the numbers of applications to Institutional Review Boards (IRB)].
    Kölch M; Märsch C; Fegert JM; Lippert HD
    Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Mar; 71(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 19221985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Imaging Biomarkers Can Inform Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice in the Era of Targeted Cancer Therapy.
    Farwell MD; Clark AS; Mankoff DA
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Jul; 1(4):421-2. PubMed ID: 26181243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability of diagnostic studies--statistics, bias and estimates of diagnostic accuracy.
    Kleijnen J; Westwood M; Whiting P
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(7):498-503. PubMed ID: 21958607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical issues in the evaluation of screening and early detection modalities.
    Etzioni R
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 18452826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studies of Medical Tests: Design and Analytical Considerations.
    Bullen JA
    Chest; 2020 Jul; 158(1S):S103-S112. PubMed ID: 32658645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Best combination of multiple diagnostic tests for screening purposes.
    Qin J; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2905-19. PubMed ID: 20862668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
    Bailey B; Amre DK
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials.
    Ferrante di Ruffano L; Hyde CJ; McCaffery KJ; Bossuyt PM; Deeks JJ
    BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e686. PubMed ID: 22354600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ordered multiple-class ROC analysis with continuous measurements.
    Nakas CT; Yiannoutsos CT
    Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(22):3437-49. PubMed ID: 15505886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The central role of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in evaluating tests for the early detection of cancer.
    Baker SG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Apr; 95(7):511-5. PubMed ID: 12671018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.