These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19326458)

  • 21. Molecular surface generation using a variable-radius solvent probe.
    Bhat S; Purisima EO
    Proteins; 2006 Jan; 62(1):244-61. PubMed ID: 16287115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modelling and mutational evidence identify the substrate binding site and functional elements in APC amino acid transporters.
    Vangelatos I; Vlachakis D; Sophianopoulou V; Diallinas G
    Mol Membr Biol; 2009 Aug; 26(5):356-70. PubMed ID: 19670073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Protein structure alignment considering phenotypic plasticity.
    Csaba G; Birzele F; Zimmer R
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i98-104. PubMed ID: 18689847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Drug-like density: a method of quantifying the "bindability" of a protein target based on a very large set of pockets and drug-like ligands from the Protein Data Bank.
    Sheridan RP; Maiorov VN; Holloway MK; Cornell WD; Gao YD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2029-40. PubMed ID: 20977231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Carbohydrate-binding proteins: Dissecting ligand structures through solvent environment occupancy.
    Gauto DF; Di Lella S; Guardia CM; Estrin DA; Martí MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jun; 113(25):8717-24. PubMed ID: 19485380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Volatile anesthetic binding to proteins is influenced by solvent and aliphatic residues.
    Streiff JH; Jones KA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):2066-73. PubMed ID: 18808106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pocket extraction on proteins via the Voronoi diagram of spheres.
    Kim D; Cho CH; Cho Y; Ryu J; Bhak J; Kim DS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Apr; 26(7):1104-12. PubMed ID: 18023220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel method for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration.
    Li S; Xi L; Wang C; Li J; Lei B; Liu H; Yao X
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(6):900-9. PubMed ID: 18785151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation.
    Huang B; Schroeder M
    BMC Struct Biol; 2006 Sep; 6():19. PubMed ID: 16995956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pocket similarity: are alpha carbons enough?
    Feldman HJ; Labute P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1466-75. PubMed ID: 20690656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. BSAlign: a rapid graph-based algorithm for detecting ligand-binding sites in protein structures.
    Aung Z; Tong JC
    Genome Inform; 2008; 21():65-76. PubMed ID: 19425148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Homology model adjustment and ligand screening with a pseudoreceptor of the human histamine H4 receptor.
    Tanrikulu Y; Proschak E; Werner T; Geppert T; Todoroff N; Klenner A; Kottke T; Sander K; Schneider E; Seifert R; Stark H; Clark T; Schneider G
    ChemMedChem; 2009 May; 4(5):820-7. PubMed ID: 19343764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploiting three kinds of interface propensities to identify protein binding sites.
    Liu B; Wang X; Lin L; Dong Q; Wang X
    Comput Biol Chem; 2009 Aug; 33(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 19646926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A fourier fingerprint-based method for protein surface representation.
    Bayley MJ; Gardiner EJ; Willett P; Artymiuk PJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(3):696-707. PubMed ID: 15921459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Context shapes: Efficient complementary shape matching for protein-protein docking.
    Shentu Z; Al Hasan M; Bystroff C; Zaki MJ
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):1056-73. PubMed ID: 17847098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Protein pockets: inventory, shape, and comparison.
    Coleman RG; Sharp KA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):589-603. PubMed ID: 20205445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Defining and characterizing protein surface using alpha shapes.
    Albou LP; Schwarz B; Poch O; Wurtz JM; Moras D
    Proteins; 2009 Jul; 76(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 19089982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.