BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19327196)

  • 21. The comprehension and production of Wh-questions in deaf and hard-of-hearing children.
    Friedmann N; Szterman R
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(2):212-35. PubMed ID: 21220767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Set-shifting and the on-line processing of relative clauses in Parkinson's disease: results from a novel eye-tracking method.
    Hochstadt J
    Cortex; 2009 Sep; 45(8):991-1011. PubMed ID: 19473654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Language-specific and universal influences in children's syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: a comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish.
    Allen S; Ozyürek A; Kita S; Brown A; Furman R; Ishizuka T; Fujii M
    Cognition; 2007 Jan; 102(1):16-48. PubMed ID: 16442518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Children's sentence planning: syntactic correlates of fluency variations.
    McDaniel D; McKee C; Garrett MF
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jan; 37(1):59-94. PubMed ID: 19523262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem.
    Spenader J; Smits EJ; Hendriks P
    J Child Lang; 2009 Jan; 36(1):23-52. PubMed ID: 18761775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Self-repair of speech by four-year-old Finnish children.
    Salonen T; Laakso M
    J Child Lang; 2009 Sep; 36(4):855-82. PubMed ID: 19079829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of relative clauses by children with language impairment.
    Hesketh A
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(7-8):539-46. PubMed ID: 17056484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque.
    Carreiras M; Duñabeitia JA; Vergara M; de la Cruz-Pavía I; Laka I
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 20035934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comprehension of wh-questions in two Broca's aphasics.
    Hickok G; Avrutin S
    Brain Lang; 1996 Feb; 52(2):314-27. PubMed ID: 8811962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can input explain children's me-for-I errors?
    Kirjavainen M; Theakston A; Lieven E
    J Child Lang; 2009 Nov; 36(5):1091-114. PubMed ID: 19220924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties.
    Cain K; Oakhill JV; Elbro C
    J Child Lang; 2003 Aug; 30(3):681-94. PubMed ID: 14513473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The prosodic (re)organization of children's early English articles.
    Demuth K; McCullough E
    J Child Lang; 2009 Jan; 36(1):173-200. PubMed ID: 18778531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The production of finite and nonfinite complement clauses by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers.
    Owen AJ; Leonard LB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):548-71. PubMed ID: 16787895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early acquisition of gender agreement in the Spanish noun phrase: starting small.
    Mariscal S
    J Child Lang; 2009 Jan; 36(1):143-71. PubMed ID: 18761756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Production of non-canonical sentences in agrammatic aphasia: limits in representation or rule application?
    Burchert F; Meissner N; De Bleser R
    Brain Lang; 2008 Feb; 104(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 17689604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lexical, morphological, and syntactic aspects of verb production in agrammatic aphasics.
    Bastiaanse R; Hugen J; Kos M; van Zonneveld R
    Brain Lang; 2002 Feb; 80(2):142-59. PubMed ID: 11827441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patterns of syntactic development in children with Williams syndrome and Down's syndrome: evidence from passives and wh-questions.
    Joffe V; Varlokosta S
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Sep; 21(9):705-27. PubMed ID: 17701757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses.
    Staub A
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 20427040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The logical syntax of number words: theory, acquisition and processing.
    Musolino J
    Cognition; 2009 Apr; 111(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 19217616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resumptive elements aid comprehension of object relative clauses: evidence from Persian.
    Rahmany R; Marefat H; Kidd E
    J Child Lang; 2014 Jul; 41(4):937-48. PubMed ID: 23920156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.