327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1932725)
1. [Cervical lymph node metastasis: significance of computerized tomography and palpation. A histologically controlled comparison].
Steinkamp HJ; Zwicker C; Langer M; Mathe F; Uhrmeister P
Rofo; 1991 Oct; 155(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 1932725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cervical lymph node metastases: a histologically controlled comparison of palpation, sonography and computed tomography].
Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
Rofo; 1990 Nov; 153(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 2173066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [B-image sonography in lymph node staging of the head and neck area. A comparison with palpation, computerized and magnetic resonance tomography].
Quetz JU; Rohr S; Hoffmann P; Wustrow J; Mertens J
HNO; 1991 Feb; 39(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 2032876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Regional lymph node metastases in malignant tumors of the head and neck: value of diagnostic procedures].
Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Jan; 70(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 2025343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Results of pretherapeutic lymph node diagnosis in head and neck tumors. Clinical value of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)].
Di Martino E; Nowak B; Krombach GA; Sellhaus B; Hausmann R; Cremerius U; Büll U; Westhofen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Apr; 79(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10838683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A histologically controlled study of the value of sonography and palpation for the detection and exclusion of neck lymph node enlargements and metastases].
Steinkamp HJ; Mathe F; Treisch J; Hosten N; Neumann K; Felix R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):312-8. PubMed ID: 1821636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modern imaging techniques and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study.
van den Brekel MW; Castelijns JA; Stel HV; Golding RP; Meyer CJ; Snow GB
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 250(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8466744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Histologically controlled comparison of palpation and sonography in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases].
Eichhorn T; Schroeder HG; Glanz H; Schwerk WB
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 May; 66(5):266-74. PubMed ID: 3302569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of palpation, ultrasound and computed tomography in the valuation of lymphatic neck metastasis].
Cinar U; Yiğit O; Topuz E; Akgül G; Unlü M; Başak M; Celebi I; Dadaş B
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2002; 9(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 12122634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cervical lymph node metastasis: CT, ultrasound versus physical palpation].
Luo D; Shi M; Xu Z
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1998 Jan; 20(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 10921058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-operative evaluation of cervical adenopathies in tumours of the upper aerodigestive tract.
Giancarlo T; Palmieri A; Giacomarra V; Russolo M
Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(4B):2805-9. PubMed ID: 9713465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Reactive enlargement of cervical lymph nodes and cervical lymph node metastases: sonography (M/Q quotient) and computed tomography].
Steinkamp HJ; Zwicker C; Langer M; Mathe M; Ehritt C; Neumann K; Felix R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Jul; 2(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 1504116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed tomography in the management of cervical lymph node pathology.
Sönmez A; Oztürk N; Ersoy B; Bayramiçli M; Celebiler O; Numanoğlu A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 17606423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Sumi M; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 11264102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Computerized tomography of the soft tissue of the neck. Lymph nodes and their differential diagnosis. II: Clinical value of CT in lymph node staging].
Lenz M
Rontgenblatter; 1990 Jul; 43(7):312-20. PubMed ID: 2392650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymphoscintigraphy for interpretation of changes of cervical lymph node function in patients with oral malignant tumors: comparison of Tc-99m-Re and Tc-99m-HSA-D.
Sato T; Yamaguchi K; Morita Y; Noikura T; Sugihara K; Matsune S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):525-37. PubMed ID: 11027392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Palpation and CT to evaluate the cervical adenopathies in head and neck tumours].
Altuna Mariezkurrena X; Henríquez Alarcón M; Zulueta Lizaur A; Vea Orte JC; Algaba Guimerá J
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2004 Apr; 55(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 15359665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Palpation, ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients.
Atula TS; Grénman R; Varpula MJ; Kurki TJ; Klemi PJ
Head Neck; 1996; 18(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 8902568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Computed tomography of cervical lymph node metastases in malignant tumors of the head and neck region].
Bähren W; Haase S; Lenz M; Ranzinger G; Wierschin W
Rofo; 1983 Sep; 139(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 6411547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography?
Haberal I; Celik H; Göçmen H; Akmansu H; Yörük M; Ozeri C
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Feb; 130(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 14990916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
