These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19327526)

  • 1. Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device.
    Fitzpatrick JR; Frederick JR; Hiesinger W; Hsu VM; McCormick RC; Kozin ED; Laporte CM; O'Hara ML; Howell E; Dougherty D; Cohen JE; Southerland KW; Howard JL; Paulson EC; Acker MA; Morris RJ; Woo YJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Apr; 137(4):971-7. PubMed ID: 19327526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of contemporary mechanical circulatory support device configurations in patients with severe biventricular failure.
    Levin AP; Jaramillo N; Garan AR; Takeda K; Takayama H; Yuzefpolskaya M; Mancini DM; Naka Y; Colombo PC; Topkara VK
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Feb; 151(2):530-5.e2. PubMed ID: 26651960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival after biventricular assist device implantation: an analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database.
    Cleveland JC; Naftel DC; Reece TB; Murray M; Antaki J; Pagani FD; Kirklin JK
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2011 Aug; 30(8):862-9. PubMed ID: 21621423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of venopulmonary arterial extracorporeal life support as temporary right ventricular support after left ventricular assist implantation.
    Shehab S; Rao S; Macdonald P; Newton PJ; Spratt P; Jansz P; Hayward CS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Dec; 156(6):2143-2152. PubMed ID: 30025607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device support for severe right heart failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion.
    Takeda K; Naka Y; Yang JA; Uriel N; Colombo PC; Jorde UP; Takayama H
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2014 Feb; 33(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 23932442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter experience with durable biventricular assist devices.
    Shah P; Ha R; Singh R; Cotts W; Adler E; Kiernan M; Brambatti M; Meehan K; Phillips S; Kidambi S; Macaluso GP; Banerjee D; Mooney D; Pham D; Pretorius VD
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2018 Sep; 37(9):1093-1101. PubMed ID: 30173824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of total artificial heart and biventricular assist device support as bridge-to-transplantation.
    Cheng A; Trivedi JR; Van Berkel VH; Massey HT; Slaughter MS
    J Card Surg; 2016 Oct; 31(10):648-653. PubMed ID: 27573150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are biventricular assist devices underused as a bridge to heart transplantation in patients with a high risk of postimplant right ventricular failure?
    Bartfay SE; Dellgren G; Lidén H; Holmberg M; Gäbel J; Redfors B; Bech-Hanssen O; Karason K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Feb; 153(2):360-367.e1. PubMed ID: 27955912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combination evaluation of preoperative risk indices predicts requirement of biventricular assist device.
    Shiga T; Kinugawa K; Imamura T; Kato N; Endo M; Inaba T; Maki H; Hatano M; Yao A; Nishimura T; Hirata Y; Kyo S; Ono M; Nagai R
    Circ J; 2012; 76(12):2785-91. PubMed ID: 22878403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.
    Farrar DJ; Hill JD; Pennington DG; McBride LR; Holman WL; Kormos RL; Esmore D; Gray LA; Seifert PE; Schoettle GP; Moore CH; Hendry PJ; Bhayana JN
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1997 Jan; 113(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 9011691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes in Patients Bridged With Univentricular and Biventricular Devices in the Modern Era of Heart Transplantation.
    Grimm JC; Sciortino CM; Magruder JT; Dungan SP; Valero V; Sharma K; Tedford RJ; Russell SD; Whitman GJ; Silvestry SC; Shah AS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Jul; 102(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 27068177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International experience using a durable, centrifugal-flow ventricular assist device for biventricular support.
    Marasco S; Simon AR; Tsui S; Schramm R; Eifert S; Hagl CM; Paç M; Kervan Ü; Fiane AE; Wagner FM; Garbade J; Özbaran M; Hayward CS; Zimpfer D; Schmitto JD
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2020 Dec; 39(12):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 32917479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive CentriMag ventricular assist device support integrated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock patients: a comparison with conventional CentriMag biventricular support configuration.
    Takeda K; Garan AR; Ando M; Han J; Topkara VK; Kurlansky P; Yuzefpolskaya M; Farr MA; Colombo PC; Naka Y; Takayama H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Dec; 52(6):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 28651347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bridge to transplantation using paracorporeal biventricular assist devices or the syncardia temporary total artificial heart: is there a difference?
    Nguyen A; Pozzi M; Mastroianni C; Léger P; Loisance D; Pavie A; Leprince P; Kirsch M
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2015 Jun; 56(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 24429805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes following implantation of mechanical circulatory support in adults with congenital heart disease: An analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS).
    VanderPluym CJ; Cedars A; Eghtesady P; Maxwell BG; Gelow JM; Burchill LJ; Maltais S; Koehl DA; Cantor RS; Blume ED
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2018 Jan; 37(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 28365175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Successful support of biventricular heart failure patients by new EXCOR
    Schmack B; Weymann A; Ruschitzka F; Autschbach R; Raake PW; Jurrmann N; Menon AK; Karck M; Wilhelm MJ; Ruhparwar A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 May; 107(5):413-420. PubMed ID: 29294144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist devices on allosensitization in adults: A comparison with left ventricular assist devices.
    Chaidaroglou A; Armenis I; Gkouziouta A; Bonios MJ; Kogerakis N; Fragoulis S; Leontiadis E; Zarkalis D; Stavridis G; Kaklamanis L; Adamopoulos S; Degiannis D
    Transpl Immunol; 2021 Dec; 69():101477. PubMed ID: 34600071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Durable circulatory support with a paracorporeal device as an option for pediatric and adult heart failure patients.
    Bartfay SE; Dellgren G; Hallhagen S; Wåhlander H; Dahlberg P; Redfors B; Ekelund J; Karason K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Apr; 161(4):1453-1464.e4. PubMed ID: 32653285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of primary biventricular support: an analysis of data from the EUROMACS registry.
    Vierecke J; Gahl B; de By TMMH; Antretter H; Beyersdorf F; Caliskan K; Krachak V; Loforte A; Potapov E; Schoenrath F; Stockman B; Vanderheyden M; Meyns B; Gummert J; Mohacsi P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Dec; 56(6):1037-1045. PubMed ID: 31369075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.
    Kormos RL; Teuteberg JJ; Pagani FD; Russell SD; John R; Miller LW; Massey T; Milano CA; Moazami N; Sundareswaran KS; Farrar DJ;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1316-24. PubMed ID: 20132950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.