841 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19328276)
1. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro study of non-axial forces upon the retention of an O-ring attachment.
Rodrigues RC; Faria AC; Macedo AP; Sartori IA; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1314-9. PubMed ID: 19681968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
