BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19328277)

  • 1. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ZrO2 three-unit fixed partial dentures: comparison of failure load before and after exposure to a mastication simulator.
    Att W; Grigoriadou M; Strub JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 34(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 17371566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
    Att W; Hoischen T; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of different zirconium dioxide three-unit all-ceramic fixed partial dentures.
    Att W; Stamouli K; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Feb; 65(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 17354090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
    Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal accuracy of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses after in vitro stress simulation.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Kraemer S; Geiss-Gerstdorfer J; Setz JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1261-9. PubMed ID: 19040441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
    Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 20059649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
    Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of metal selection and porcelain firing on the marginal accuracy of titanium-based metal ceramic restorations.
    Shokry TE; Attia M; Mosleh I; Elhosary M; Hamza T; Shen C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 20105684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study.
    Raigrodski AJ; Chiche GJ; Potiket N; Hochstedler JL; Mohamed SE; Billiot S; Mercante DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 17052467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems.
    Stappert CF; Dai M; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Br Dent J; 2004 Jun; 196(12):766-70; discussion 760, quiz 780. PubMed ID: 15220983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Reich S; Kappe K; Teschner H; Schmitt J
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19049530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.