494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19328622)
1. Photodynamic diagnosis using 5-aminolevulinic acid for the detection of positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy in patients with carcinoma of the prostate: a multicentre, prospective, phase 2 trial of a diagnostic procedure.
Adam C; Salomon G; Walther S; Zaak D; Khoder W; Becker A; Reich O; Blana A; Ganzer R; Denzinger S; Popken G; Sroka R; Knüchel-Clarke R; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Hartmann A; Bertz S; Graefen M; Huland H; Wieland W; Stief CG
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1281-8. PubMed ID: 19328622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photodynamic diagnosis of prostate cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid--first clinical experiences.
Zaak D; Sroka R; Khoder W; Adam C; Tritschler S; Karl A; Reich O; Knuechel R; Baumgartner R; Tilki D; Popken G; Hofstetter A; Stief CG
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 18405945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photodynamic diagnosis of positive margin during radical prostatectomy: preliminary experience with 5-aminolevulinic acid.
Fukuhara H; Inoue K; Satake H; Tamura K; Karashima T; Yamasaki I; Tatsuo I; Kurabayashi A; Furihata M; Shuin T
Int J Urol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):585-91. PubMed ID: 21658132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.
Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Grande S; Morra I; Scarpa RM
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative photodynamic evaluation of surgical margins during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy with the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid.
Ganzer R; Blana A; Denzinger S; Wieland WF; Adam C; Becker A; Khoder W; Walther S; Stief CG; Zaak D; Salomon G; Hartmann A; Knuechel R; Bertz S; Popken G
J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1387-94. PubMed ID: 19673655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of 5-aminolevulinic-acid-based photodynamic diagnosis for radical prostatectomy.
Fukuhara H; Inoue K; Kurabayashi A; Furihata M; Shuin T
BMC Urol; 2015 Aug; 15():78. PubMed ID: 26232024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oral 5-aminolevulinic acid in simultaneous photodynamic diagnosis of upper and lower urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma - a prospective audit.
Ahmad S; Aboumarzouk O; Somani B; Nabi G; Kata SG
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E596-600. PubMed ID: 22758907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive apical surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy, truth or artefact?
Connolly SS; O'Toole GC; O'Malley KJ; Manecksha R; O'Brien A; Mulvin DW; Quinlan DM
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15204423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-adjusted hazard rates of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.
Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):412-19. PubMed ID: 19027223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience.
Xylinas E; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Vaessen C; Renard-Penna R; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Cussenot O; Roupret M
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1173-8; discussion 1178. PubMed ID: 19040530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity.
Williams SB; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20942827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Peroperative biopsy of the sub-apical urethra during prostatectomy for cancer].
Ponthieu A; Delgrande J; Ivaldi A
Prog Urol; 1996 Apr; 6(2):250-5; discussion 255-6. PubMed ID: 8777418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue.
Rabbani F; Vora KC; Yunis LH; Eastham JA; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Touijer K
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 19689577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
