These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19329068)

  • 21. Eukaryotic gene prediction using GeneMark.hmm-E and GeneMark-ES.
    Borodovsky M; Lomsadze A
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; Chapter 4():4.6.1-4.6.10. PubMed ID: 21901742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of gene prediction software using a genomic data set: application to Arabidopsis thaliana sequences.
    Pavy N; Rombauts S; Déhais P; Mathé C; Ramana DV; Leroy P; Rouzé P
    Bioinformatics; 1999 Nov; 15(11):887-99. PubMed ID: 10743555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. IPred - integrating ab initio and evidence based gene predictions to improve prediction accuracy.
    Zickmann F; Renard BY
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):134. PubMed ID: 25766582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving gene-finding in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii:GreenGenie2.
    Kwan AL; Li L; Kulp DC; Dutcher SK; Stormo GD
    BMC Genomics; 2009 May; 10():210. PubMed ID: 19422688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. mGene: accurate SVM-based gene finding with an application to nematode genomes.
    Schweikert G; Zien A; Zeller G; Behr J; Dieterich C; Ong CS; Philips P; De Bona F; Hartmann L; Bohlen A; Krüger N; Sonnenburg S; Rätsch G
    Genome Res; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2133-43. PubMed ID: 19564452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gene structure prediction from consensus spliced alignment of multiple ESTs matching the same genomic locus.
    Brendel V; Xing L; Zhu W
    Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 20(7):1157-69. PubMed ID: 14764557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Splice2Deep: An ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks for improved splice site prediction in genomic DNA.
    Albaradei S; Magana-Mora A; Thafar M; Uludag M; Bajic VB; Gojobori T; Essack M; Jankovic BR
    Gene; 2020 Dec; 763S():100035. PubMed ID: 34493371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting Genes in Single Genomes with AUGUSTUS.
    Hoff KJ; Stanke M
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 65(1):e57. PubMed ID: 30466165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. EuGene: An Automated Integrative Gene Finder for Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes.
    Sallet E; Gouzy J; Schiex T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1962():97-120. PubMed ID: 31020556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Leveraging the mouse genome for gene prediction in human: from whole-genome shotgun reads to a global synteny map.
    Flicek P; Keibler E; Hu P; Korf I; Brent MR
    Genome Res; 2003 Jan; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 12529305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CodingQuarry: highly accurate hidden Markov model gene prediction in fungal genomes using RNA-seq transcripts.
    Testa AC; Hane JK; Ellwood SR; Oliver RP
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):170. PubMed ID: 25887563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gene finding in the chicken genome.
    Eyras E; Reymond A; Castelo R; Bye JM; Camara F; Flicek P; Huckle EJ; Parra G; Shteynberg DD; Wyss C; Rogers J; Antonarakis SE; Birney E; Guigo R; Brent MR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():131. PubMed ID: 15924626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence-based gene predictions in plant genomes.
    Liang C; Mao L; Ware D; Stein L
    Genome Res; 2009 Oct; 19(10):1912-23. PubMed ID: 19541913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative gene prediction in human and mouse.
    Parra G; Agarwal P; Abril JF; Wiehe T; Fickett JW; Guigó R
    Genome Res; 2003 Jan; 13(1):108-17. PubMed ID: 12529313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ancient evolutionary signals of protein-coding sequences allow the discovery of new genes in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
    Casimiro-Soriguer CS; Rubio A; Jimenez J; Pérez-Pulido AJ
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):210. PubMed ID: 32138644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bioinformatic analysis of exon repetition, exon scrambling and trans-splicing in humans.
    Shao X; Shepelev V; Fedorov A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 16308355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gene structure prediction by spliced alignment of genomic DNA with protein sequences: increased accuracy by differential splice site scoring.
    Usuka J; Brendel V
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Apr; 297(5):1075-85. PubMed ID: 10764574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vertebrate gene finding from multiple-species alignments using a two-level strategy.
    Carter D; Durbin R
    Genome Biol; 2006; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6.1-12. PubMed ID: 16925840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving gene recognition accuracy by combining predictions from two gene-finding programs.
    Rogic S; Ouellette BF; Mackworth AK
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Aug; 18(8):1034-45. PubMed ID: 12176826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genome-wide validation of Magnaporthe grisea gene structures based on transcription evidence.
    Numa H; Nishimura M; Tanaka T; Kanamori H; Yang CC; Matsumoto T; Nagamura Y; Itoh T
    FEBS Lett; 2009 Feb; 583(4):797-800. PubMed ID: 19186180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.