395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19329359)
1. The paradoxical effect of warning on reaction time: demonstrating proactive response inhibition with event-related potentials.
Boulinguez P; Ballanger B; Granjon L; Benraiss A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 19329359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Warning signals induce automatic EMG activations and proactive volitional inhibition: evidence from analysis of error distribution in simple RT.
Boulinguez P; Jaffard M; Granjon L; Benraiss A
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):1572-8. PubMed ID: 18171709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts.
Hsieh S; Wu M
Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1423():41-52. PubMed ID: 22000079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity.
Czigler I; Pató L
Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19111891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of allocation of visuo-spatial attention to visual stimuli triggering unilateral arm abduction on anticipatory postural control.
Tomita H; Fujiwara K
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2086-97. PubMed ID: 18620907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanisms of deficit of visuospatial attention shift in children with developmental coordination disorder: a neurophysiological measure of the endogenous Posner paradigm.
Tsai CL; Pan CY; Cherng RJ; Hsu YW; Chiu HH
Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 19751962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of preparatory activity indexed by the contingent negative variation in children.
Flores AB; Digiacomo MR; Meneres S; Trigo E; Gómez CM
Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 19500893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual basis of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search.
Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 20044891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task.
Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Sep; 115(9):2001-13. PubMed ID: 15294202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arousal-state modulation in children with AD/HD.
Benikos N; Johnstone SJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 120(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 19027356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intracerebral P3-like waveforms and the length of the stimulus-response interval in a visual oddball paradigm.
Roman R; Brázdil M; Jurák P; Rektor I; Kukleta M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 15589195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic versus contingent mechanisms of sensory-driven neural biasing and reflexive attention.
Hopfinger JB; Ries AJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1341-52. PubMed ID: 16197688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
Hsieh S; Liu LC
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do not neglect small troubles: moderately negative stimuli affect target processing more intensely than highly negative stimuli.
Yuan J; Lu H; Yang J; Li H
Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1415():84-95. PubMed ID: 21875701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
