309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19330168)
21. Accurate identification of HER2-positive patients is essential for superior outcomes with trastuzumab therapy.
Chorn N
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2006 Nov; 33(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 16518442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. HER2+ breast cancer: how to evaluate?
Schmitt F
Adv Ther; 2009 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S1-8. PubMed ID: 19669636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing may influence therapy eligibility.
Bernasconi B; Chiaravalli AM; Finzi G; Milani K; Tibiletti MG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 May; 133(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 21901388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Update on HER2 testing for breast and upper gastrointestinal tract cancers.
Ross JS
Biomark Med; 2011 Jun; 5(3):307-18. PubMed ID: 21657840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.
Shah SS; Ketterling RP; Goetz MP; Ingle JN; Reynolds CA; Perez EA; Chen B
Hum Pathol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 19762065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Quality assured HER2 analysis in breast cancer. Important therapeutic predictive and prognostic factor].
Fernö M; Haglund M; Bendahl PO; Olsson H; Rydén L
Lakartidningen; 2008 Aug 6-19; 105(32-33):2181-4. PubMed ID: 18780693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. HER2-positive breast cancer cells resistant to trastuzumab and lapatinib lose reliance upon HER2 and are sensitive to the multitargeted kinase inhibitor sorafenib.
Valabrega G; Capellero S; Cavalloni G; Zaccarello G; Petrelli A; Migliardi G; Milani A; Peraldo-Neia C; Gammaitoni L; Sapino A; Pecchioni C; Moggio A; Giordano S; Aglietta M; Montemurro F
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 21153051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Expression of HER2 and the coamplified genes GRB7 and MLN64 in human breast cancer: quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR as a diagnostic alternative to immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Vinatzer U; Dampier B; Streubel B; Pacher M; Seewald MJ; Stratowa C; Kaserer K; Schreiber M
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Dec; 11(23):8348-57. PubMed ID: 16322295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estrogen receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer tissue have the highest Ki-67 labeling index and EGFR expression: gene amplification does not contribute to EGFR expression.
Umemura S; Takekoshi S; Suzuki Y; Saitoh Y; Tokuda Y; Osamura RY
Oncol Rep; 2005 Aug; 14(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 16012712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. HER2 immunohistochemistry significantly overestimates HER2 amplification in uterine papillary serous carcinomas.
Mentrikoski MJ; Stoler MH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Jun; 38(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 24698965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Targeted therapy for cancer: the HER-2/neu and Herceptin story.
Ross JS; Gray GS
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 14692077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [HER2 testing for breast cancer. Swedish laboratories can now offer a quality assured analysis of growth factor].
Haglund M; Chebil G; Johansson L
Lakartidningen; 2005 Mar 7-13; 102(10):740-3. PubMed ID: 15839164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recent trends of HER-2 testing and trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer.
Kurosumi M
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 19657709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determination of HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and concordance with the clinical trials immunohistochemical assay in women with metastatic breast cancer evaluated for treatment with trastuzumab.
Dybdal N; Leiberman G; Anderson S; McCune B; Bajamonde A; Cohen RL; Mass RD; Sanders C; Press MF
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Sep; 93(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16184453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laboratory testing for HER2/neu in breast carcinoma: an evolving strategy to predict response to targeted therapy.
Diaz NM
Cancer Control; 2001; 8(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 11579337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Should HER2 status be routinely measured for all breast cancer patients?
Ravdin PM
Semin Oncol; 1999 Aug; 26(4 Suppl 12):117-23. PubMed ID: 10482203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The equivocally amplified HER2 FISH result on breast core biopsy: indications for further sampling do affect patient management.
Striebel JM; Bhargava R; Horbinski C; Surti U; Dabbs DJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Mar; 129(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 18285260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast cancer HER2 equivocal cases: is there an alternative to FISH testing? A pilot study using two different antibodies sequentially.
Yosepovich A; Avivi C; Bar J; Polak-Charcon S; Mardoukh C; Barshack I
Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Jun; 12(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 20928989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. HER2 testing: current status and future directions.
Perez EA; Cortés J; Gonzalez-Angulo AM; Bartlett JM
Cancer Treat Rev; 2014 Mar; 40(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24080154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Her2-positive breast cancer: herceptin and beyond.
Dean-Colomb W; Esteva FJ
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Dec; 44(18):2806-12. PubMed ID: 19022660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
