718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19330396)
1. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Under suspicion.
Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7293):1245. PubMed ID: 20428116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Shadow of doubt.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):498-500. PubMed ID: 21296856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retraction notice.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Coping with scientific misconduct.
Wager E
BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6586. PubMed ID: 22016451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Anaesthetics journals retract further articles after ethics approval is found lacking.
Torjesen I
BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2019. PubMed ID: 22415958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1049-50. PubMed ID: 17130794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 70(12):2017-8. PubMed ID: 17045345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Correcting the scientific record.
Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retractions: trends, implications, and possible further steps.
Giglia E; Pescarmona GP
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 22614895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. View point: Retraction is a pain but scientific misconduct is a crime!
Tewari P
Ann Card Anaesth; 2018; 21(2):109-110. PubMed ID: 29652267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides.
Wylie DT
Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Report from the Scientific Integrity Advisor: issues arising in 2005 and 2006.
Daroff RB
Neurology; 2007 May; 68(21):1841-2. PubMed ID: 17515547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
