BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19330464)

  • 21. Risk of endometrial cancer for women diagnosed with HNPCC-related colorectal carcinoma.
    Obermair A; Youlden DR; Young JP; Lindor NM; Baron JA; Newcomb P; Parry S; Hopper JL; Haile R; Jenkins MA
    Int J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 127(11):2678-84. PubMed ID: 20533284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients.
    Schlich-Bakker KJ; ten Kroode HF; Ausems MG
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jul; 62(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 16242293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Family communication, genetic testing and colonoscopy screening in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer: a qualitative study.
    McCann S; MacAuley D; Barnett Y; Bunting B; Bradley A; Jeffers L; Morrison PJ
    Psychooncology; 2009 Nov; 18(11):1208-15. PubMed ID: 19177338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake.
    Codori AM; Petersen GM; Miglioretti DL; Larkin EK; Bushey MT; Young C; Brensinger JD; Johnson K; Bacon JA; Booker SV
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Apr; 8(4 Pt 2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10207639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature.
    Meiser B
    Psychooncology; 2005 Dec; 14(12):1060-74. PubMed ID: 15937976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a prospective follow-up study.
    Aktan-Collan K; Haukkala A; Mecklin JP; Uutela A; Kääriäinen H
    Int J Cancer; 2001 Aug; 93(4):608-11. PubMed ID: 11477567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Counterpoint: implementing population genetic screening for Lynch Syndrome among newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients--will the ends justify the means?
    Hall MJ
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2010 May; 8(5):606-11. PubMed ID: 20495087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genetic predictive testing for bowel cancer predisposition: the impact on the individual.
    Chapman PD; Burn J
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1999; 86(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 10545701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recording of family history is associated with colorectal cancer stage.
    Kessels K; de Groot NL; Fidder HH; Timmer R; Stolk MF; Offerhaus GJ; Siersema PD;
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Apr; 25(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 23470269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome.
    Kang YJ; Killen J; Caruana M; Simms K; Taylor N; Frayling IM; Snowsill T; Huxley N; Coupe VM; Hughes S; Freeman V; Boussioutas A; Trainer AH; Ward RL; Mitchell G; Macrae FA; Canfell K
    Med J Aust; 2020 Feb; 212(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 31595523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Risk of multiple colorectal cancer development depends on age and subgroup in individuals with hereditary predisposition.
    Lindberg LJ; Wegen-Haitsma W; Ladelund S; Smith-Hansen L; Therkildsen C; Bernstein I; Nilbert M
    Fam Cancer; 2019 Apr; 18(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 30302651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    Ashida S; Hadley DW; Vaughn BK; Kuhn NR; Jenkins JF; Koehly LM
    Clin Genet; 2009 Jan; 75(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 19021640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experience of the implementation and outcomes of universal testing for Lynch syndrome in the United Kingdom.
    Cavazza A; Radia C; Harlow C; Monahan KJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Jul; 21(7):760-766. PubMed ID: 30815953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of predictive models in daily practice for the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome.
    Tresallet C; Brouquet A; Julié C; Beauchet A; Vallot C; Ménégaux F; Mitry E; Radvanyi F; Malafosse R; Rougier P; Nordlinger B; Laurent-Puig P; Boileau C; Emile JF; Muti C; Penna C; Hofmann-Radvanyi H
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Mar; 130(6):1367-77. PubMed ID: 21520036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of Lynch Syndrome in an Indigenous family living in a remote West Australian community.
    Schofield L; Goldblatt J; Iacopetta B
    Rural Remote Health; 2011; 11(4):1836. PubMed ID: 22188021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health and lifestyle behaviors among persons at risk of Lynch syndrome.
    Burton AM; Peterson SK; Marani SK; Vernon SW; Amos CI; Frazier ML; Lynch PM; Gritz ER
    Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Apr; 21(4):513-21. PubMed ID: 20012181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of Tumor Sequencing as a Replacement for Lynch Syndrome Screening and Current Molecular Tests for Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
    Hampel H; Pearlman R; Beightol M; Zhao W; Jones D; Frankel WL; Goodfellow PJ; Yilmaz A; Miller K; Bacher J; Jacobson A; Paskett E; Shields PG; Goldberg RM; de la Chapelle A; Shirts BH; Pritchard CC;
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jun; 4(6):806-813. PubMed ID: 29596542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High Prevalence of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Colorectal Cancer.
    Mork ME; You YN; Ying J; Bannon SA; Lynch PM; Rodriguez-Bigas MA; Vilar E
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(31):3544-9. PubMed ID: 26195711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychological impact of genetic counseling for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: the role of cancer history, gender, age, and psychological distress.
    Hasenbring MI; Kreddig N; Deges G; Epplen JT; Kunstmann E; Stemmler S; Schulmann K; Willert J; Schmiegel W
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2011 Apr; 15(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 21194311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing.
    van Oostrom I; Meijers-Heijboer H; Duivenvoorden HJ; Bröcker-Vriends AH; van Asperen CJ; Sijmons RH; Seynaeve C; Van Gool AR; Klijn JG; Tibben A
    Ann Oncol; 2006 Jul; 17(7):1090-5. PubMed ID: 16600981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.