237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19331451)
1. Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.
Chai XJ; Jacobs LF
Behav Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 123(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 19331451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.
Chai XJ; Jacobs LF
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 19963014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex differences in cue perception in a visual scene: investigation of cue type.
Barkley CL; Gabriel KI
Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 17469918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.
Cánovas R; García RF; Cimadevilla JM
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 20655953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex differences in human virtual water maze performance: novel measures reveal the relative contribution of directional responding and spatial knowledge.
Woolley DG; Vermaercke B; Op de Beeck H; Wagemans J; Gantois I; D'Hooge R; Swinnen SP; Wenderoth N
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 20035800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Men and women differ in object memory but not performance of a virtual radial maze.
Levy LJ; Astur RS; Frick KM
Behav Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 119(4):853-62. PubMed ID: 16187814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation.
Andersen NE; Dahmani L; Konishi K; Bohbot VD
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Jan; 97(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 22001012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Delayed development of place navigation compared to directional responding in young rats.
Akers KG; Candelaria-Cook FT; Rice JP; Johnson TE; Hamilton DA
Behav Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 123(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 19331450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct measurement of spontaneous strategy selection in a virtual Morris water maze shows females choose an allocentric strategy at least as often as males do.
van Gerven DJ; Schneider AN; Wuitchik DM; Skelton RW
Behav Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 126(3):465-78. PubMed ID: 22642888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex-specific strategies in spatial orientation in C57BL/6J mice.
Bettis TJ; Jacobs LF
Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 19622389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The world is not flat: can people reorient using slope?
Nardi D; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):354-67. PubMed ID: 21171808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knowing where we're heading--when nothing moves.
Snyder JJ; Bischof WF
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1323():127-38. PubMed ID: 20132801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The contribution of spatial cues to memory: direction, but not cue, changes support response reversal learning.
Wright SL; Williams D; Evans JH; Skinner DM; Martin GM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 19364227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution ERP mapping of cortical activation related to implicit object-location memory.
Murphy JS; Wynne CE; O'Rourke EM; Commins S; Roche RA
Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 19683556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Control of rodent and human spatial navigation by room and apparatus cues.
Hamilton DA; Johnson TE; Redhead ES; Verney SP
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):154-69. PubMed ID: 19121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Orienting in virtual environments: How are surface features and environmental geometry weighted in an orientation task?
Kelly DM; Bischof WF
Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 18834974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.
Wilson PN; Alexander T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 18980401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment.
Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Place-related neural responses in the monkey hippocampal formation in a virtual space.
Hori E; Nishio Y; Kazui K; Umeno K; Tabuchi E; Sasaki K; Endo S; Ono T; Nishijo H
Hippocampus; 2005; 15(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 16108028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
