These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19331451)

  • 21. Effects of sex on object recognition and spatial navigation in humans.
    Rizk-Jackson AM; Acevedo SF; Inman D; Howieson D; Benice TS; Raber J
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 173(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 16887201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape.
    Alexander T; Wilson SP; Wilson PN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):694-708. PubMed ID: 19379044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cue conditions and wayfinding in older and younger women.
    Davis RL; Therrien BA; West BT
    Res Gerontol Nurs; 2008 Oct; 1(4):252-63. PubMed ID: 20078000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Up by upwest: Is slope like north?
    Weisberg SM; Nardi D; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1959-76. PubMed ID: 24397309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gender differences in navigating virtual worlds.
    Sakthivel M; Patterson PE; Cruz-Neira C
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1999; 35():353-9. PubMed ID: 11143377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Normal and impaired reflexive orienting of attention after central nonpredictive cues.
    Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Zorzi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):745-59. PubMed ID: 18578597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex differences in a landmark environmental re-orientation task only during the learning phase.
    Piccardi L; Bianchini F; Iasevoli L; Giannone G; Guariglia C
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Oct; 503(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 21889578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of local and global geometry from object arrays by adult humans.
    Reichert JF; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2011 Feb; 86(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 21144887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reorienting when cues conflict: A role for information content in spatial learning?
    Sturz BR; Diemer SM
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 19903512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preference for spatial cues in a non-storing songbird species.
    Hodgson ZG; Healy SD
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Jul; 8(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 15611879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blocking and overshadowing in human geometry learning.
    Prados J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 20853982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evidence for a shift from place navigation to directional responding in one variant of the Morris water task.
    Hamilton DA; Akers KG; Johnson TE; Rice JP; Candelaria FT; Redhead ES
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 19364235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rats' use of geometric, featural and orientation cues to locate a hidden goal.
    Batty ER; Hoban L; Spetch ML; Dickson CT
    Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 19683037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Landmark based navigation in brain-damaged patients with neglect.
    Nico D; Piccardi L; Iaria G; Bianchini F; Zompanti L; Guariglia C
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1898-907. PubMed ID: 18316102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments.
    Kelly JW; Avraamides MN; Loomis JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1092-107. PubMed ID: 17983315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
    Cutmore TR; Djakovic T; Kebbell MR; Shum DH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18789361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploration in a dark open field: a shift from directional to positional progression and a proposed model of acquiring spatial information.
    Avni R; Zadicario P; Eilam D
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 171(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 16712970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence for the influence of testosterone in the performance of spatial navigation in a virtual water maze in women but not in men.
    Burkitt J; Widman D; Saucier DM
    Horm Behav; 2007 May; 51(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 17462646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive maps and attention.
    Hardt O; Nadel L
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():181-94. PubMed ID: 19733757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Random Walker Test: a computerized alternative to the Road-Map Test.
    Uchiyama H; Mitsuishi K; Ohno H
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1242-53. PubMed ID: 19897833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.