380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19331497)
1. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming.
Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming.
Mayr S; Buchner A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):932-43. PubMed ID: 16846289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory negative priming endures response modality change; prime response retrieval does not.
Mayr S; Buchner A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):653-65. PubMed ID: 19626576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials.
Frings C; Bermeitinger C; Gibbons H
Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 1407():69-78. PubMed ID: 21764039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming.
Rothermund K; Wentura D; De Houwer J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):482-95. PubMed ID: 15910132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
Mayr S; Buchner A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequence effects in cued task switching modulate response preparedness and repetition priming processes.
Jamadar S; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):365-86. PubMed ID: 20003149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revisiting the role of probe distractors in negative priming: location negative priming is observed when probe distractors are consistently absent.
Chao HF
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1072-82. PubMed ID: 19525538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses.
Huestegge L; Koch I
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
Los SA; Van der Burg E
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the control of single-prime negative priming: the effects of practice and time course.
Chao HF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1286-95. PubMed ID: 19686021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No evidence for a cue mismatch in negative priming.
Mayr S; Hauke R; Buchner A; Niedeggen M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):645-52. PubMed ID: 19123117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response-selection conflict contributes to inhibition of return.
Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):991-9. PubMed ID: 18752398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ERP components activated by the "GO!" and "WITHHOLD!" conflict in the random Sustained Attention to Response Task.
Zordan L; Sarlo M; Stablum F
Brain Cogn; 2008 Feb; 66(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17651880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Change in effects of motor preparation due to priming as a function of the amount of practice].
Audiffren M; Blandin Y
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Dec; 55(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 11768856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of contextual similarity and target-repetition proportion on negative priming in RT distributional analyses.
Tse CS; Hutchison KA; Li Y
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):180-92. PubMed ID: 20731509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
