These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19331506)

  • 1. Beyond nonutilization: irrelevant cues can gate learning in probabilistic categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):530-50. PubMed ID: 19331506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knowledge partitioning in categorization: constraints on exemplar models.
    Yang LX; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1045-64. PubMed ID: 15355135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multiple-cue learning approach as the basis for understanding and improving soccer referees' decision making.
    Plessner H; Schweizer G; Brand R; O'Hare D
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():151-8. PubMed ID: 19477337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population of linear experts: knowledge partitioning and function learning.
    Kalish ML; Lewandowsky S; Kruschke JK
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Oct; 111(4):1072-99. PubMed ID: 15482074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilistic categorization: how do normal participants and amnesic patients do it?
    Meeter M; Radics G; Myers CE; Gluck MA; Hopkins RO
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2008; 32(2):237-48. PubMed ID: 18226722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insight and strategy in multiple-cue learning.
    Lagnado DA; Newell BR; Kahan S; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):162-83. PubMed ID: 16719649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limitations of exemplar models of multi-attribute probabilistic inference.
    Nosofsky RM; Bergert FB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):999-1019. PubMed ID: 17983309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of working memory capacity in multiple-cue probability learning.
    Rolison JJ; Evans JS; Walsh CR; Dennis I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1494-514. PubMed ID: 21722064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do children profit from looking beyond looks? From similarity-based to cue abstraction processes in multiple-cue judgment.
    von Helversen B; Mata R; Olsson H
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jan; 46(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 20053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exemplar effects in the context of a categorization rule: Featural and holistic influences.
    Thibaut JP; Gelaes S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1403-15. PubMed ID: 17087592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization.
    Rehder B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1141-59. PubMed ID: 14622052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of feedback in multiple-cue probability learning.
    Newell BR; Weston NJ; Tunney RJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):890-908. PubMed ID: 18932062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning in a changing environment.
    Speekenbrink M; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):266-98. PubMed ID: 20438252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequence learning and selection difficulty.
    Rowland LA; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):287-99. PubMed ID: 16634671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.