These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19331509)
1. Testing the race model inequality in redundant stimuli with variable onset asynchrony. Gondan M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):575-9. PubMed ID: 19331509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The race model inequality: interpreting a geometric measure of the amount of violation. Colonius H; Diederich A Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 16478305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A permutation test for the race model inequality. Gondan M Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20160282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Generalizations of the race model inequality. Gondan M; Blurton SP Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):95-122. PubMed ID: 23713201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A tutorial on testing the race model inequality. Gondan M; Minakata K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):723-35. PubMed ID: 26637234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Showing that the race model inequality is not violated. Gondan M; Riehl V; Blurton SP Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 21858603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The race model inequality for censored reaction time distributions. Rach S; Diederich A; Steenken R; Colonius H Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):839-47. PubMed ID: 20348587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Miller J; Reynolds A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1126-42. PubMed ID: 14640834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing the race model inequality: an algorithm and computer programs. Ulrich R; Miller J; Schröter H Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 17695357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Crossmodal interaction in speeded responses: time window of integration model. Diederich A; Colonius H Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():119-35. PubMed ID: 19477335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiology reveals semantic priming at a short SOA irrespective of depth of prime processing. Küper K; Heil M Neurosci Lett; 2009 Apr; 453(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 19356603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic biases and Type I error accumulation in tests of the race model inequality. Kiesel A; Miller J; Ulrich R Behav Res Methods; 2007 Aug; 39(3):539-51. PubMed ID: 17958166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exaggerated redundancy gain in the split brain: a hemispheric coactivation account. Miller J Cogn Psychol; 2004 Sep; 49(2):118-54. PubMed ID: 15304369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Navon D; Miller J Cogn Psychol; 2002 May; 44(3):193-251. PubMed ID: 11971632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new nonparametric test for the race model inequality. Lombardi L; D'Alessandro M; Colonius H Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2290-2301. PubMed ID: 30484220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. Tombu M; Jolicoeur P J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):790-802. PubMed ID: 16131250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. Brown SD; Marley AA; Donkin C; Heathcote A Psychol Rev; 2008 Apr; 115(2):396-425. PubMed ID: 18426295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints. Stoel RD; Garre FG; Dolan C; van den Wittenboer G Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):439-55. PubMed ID: 17154756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A time course analysis of the synesthetic colour priming effect. Spruyt A; Koch J; Vandromme H; Hermans D; Eelen P Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 19739904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory apparent motion between sine waves differing in frequency. Strybel TZ; Menges ML Perception; 1998; 27(4):483-95. PubMed ID: 9797926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]