172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19332775)
1. Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 presidential election.
Rand DG; Pfeiffer T; Dreber A; Sheketoff RW; Wernerfelt NC; Benkler Y
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Apr; 106(15):6187-91. PubMed ID: 19332775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.
Oc B; Moore C; Bashshur MR
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197848. PubMed ID: 29795642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testosterone fluctuations in response to a democratic election predict partisan attitudes toward the elected leader.
Prasad S; Knight EL; Sarkar A; Welker KM; Lassetter B; Mehta PH
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2021 Nov; 133():105396. PubMed ID: 34508970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Smearing the opposition: implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. Presidential candidates and the current U.S. President.
Kosloff S; Greenberg J; Schmader T; Dechesne M; Weise D
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Aug; 139(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 20677891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicted and experienced affective responses to the outcome of the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
Kitchens MB; Corser GC; Gohm CL; VonWaldner KL; Foreman EL
Psychol Rep; 2010 Dec; 107(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 21323142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assaults on Days of Campaign Rallies During the 2016 US Presidential Election.
Morrison CN; Ukert B; Palumbo A; Dong B; Jacoby SF; Wiebe DJ
Epidemiology; 2018 Jul; 29(4):490-493. PubMed ID: 29543668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using group consciousness theories to understand political activism: case studies of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Ingo Hasselbach.
Duncan LE
J Pers; 2010 Dec; 78(6):1601-36. PubMed ID: 21039526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The multidimensional politics of inequality: taking stock of identity politics in the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
McCall L; Orloff AS
Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S34-S56. PubMed ID: 29114864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Independent Relationship of Changes in Death Rates with Changes in US Presidential Voting.
Goldman L; Lim MP; Chen Q; Jin P; Muennig P; Vagelos A
J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 34(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 30187378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Did Hurricane Sandy influence the 2012 US presidential election?
Hart J
Soc Sci Res; 2014 Jul; 46():1-8. PubMed ID: 24767585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Did private election administration funding advantage Democrats in 2020?
Lal A; Thompson DM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(22):e2317563121. PubMed ID: 38771875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The politics of color: preferences for Republican red versus Democratic blue.
Schloss KB; Palmer SE
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1481-8. PubMed ID: 24733398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Judging Political Hearts and Minds: How Political Dynamics Drive Social Judgments.
Cornwell JF; Bajger AT; Higgins ET
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26068717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using "Big Data" Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election.
Ma-Kellams C; Bishop B; Zhang MF; Villagrana B
Psychol Rep; 2018 Aug; 121(4):726-735. PubMed ID: 29298630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Psychobiographical and Psycho-Political Comparison of Clinton and Trump.
Elovitz PH
J Psychohist; 2016; 44(2):90-113. PubMed ID: 29442485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.
Eun SJ; Lee JY; Jung HM; Lee JS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163763. PubMed ID: 27711213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Do Acquired Political Identities Influence Our Neural Processing toward Others within the Context of a Trust Game?
Wu CT; Fan YT; Du YR; Yang TT; Liu HL; Yen NS; Chen SH; Hsung RM
Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():23. PubMed ID: 29456496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
