159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19332851)
1. Impact of whole-body CT screening on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Di Giulio L; Morini S
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):156-65. PubMed ID: 19332851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Kim DH; Zullo A; Iafrate F; Di Giulio L; Morini S
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Apr; 168(7):696-705. PubMed ID: 18413551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
Regge D; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 19188317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.
van Gils P; van den Berg M; van Kranen H; de Wit AG
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jun; 45(9):1554-9. PubMed ID: 19261464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.
Heitman SJ; Manns BJ; Hilsden RJ; Fong A; Dean S; Romagnuolo J
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):877-81. PubMed ID: 16217110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value-of-information analysis to guide future research in colorectal cancer screening.
Hassan C; Hunink MG; Laghi A; Pickhardt PJ; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Di Giulio E
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 19789242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for coronary artery calcium in asymptomatic individuals.
van Kempen BJ; Spronk S; Koller MT; Elias-Smale SE; Fleischmann KE; Ikram MA; Krestin GP; Hofman A; Witteman JC; Hunink MG
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 58(16):1690-701. PubMed ID: 21982314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18094303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Economic Analysis.
Palimaka S; Blackhouse G; Goeree R
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(15):1-43. PubMed ID: 26366240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1509-16. PubMed ID: 18941093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.
Vijan S; Hwang I; Inadomi J; Wong RK; Choi JR; Napierkowski J; Koff JM; Pickhardt PJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 17156139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography].
Stoker J
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A604. PubMed ID: 20003555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidental extracolonic findings on CT colonography: the impending deluge and its implications.
Berland LL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 19111266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
