These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19333334)

  • 1. Parametric modeling of edge effects for polishing tool influence functions.
    Kim DW; Park WH; Kim SW; Burge JH
    Opt Express; 2009 Mar; 17(7):5656-65. PubMed ID: 19333334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-sequential optimization technique for a computer controlled optical surfacing process using multiple tool influence functions.
    Kim DW; Kim SW; Burge JH
    Opt Express; 2009 Nov; 17(24):21850-66. PubMed ID: 19997430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Edge effect modeling and experiments on active lap processing.
    Liu H; Wu F; Zeng Z; Fan B; Wan Y
    Opt Express; 2014 May; 22(9):10761-74. PubMed ID: 24921777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pseudo-random tool paths for CNC sub-aperture polishing and other applications.
    Dunn CR; Walker DD
    Opt Express; 2008 Nov; 16(23):18942-9. PubMed ID: 19581985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling of edge effect in subaperture tool influence functions of computer controlled optical surfacing.
    Wan S; Zhang X; He X; Xu M
    Appl Opt; 2016 Dec; 55(36):10223-10228. PubMed ID: 28059243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategy of restraining ripple error on surface for optical fabrication.
    Wang T; Cheng H; Feng Y; Tam H
    Appl Opt; 2014 Sep; 53(26):6058-65. PubMed ID: 25321688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization technique for rolled edge control process based on the acentric tool influence functions.
    Du H; Song C; Li S; Xu M; Peng X
    Appl Opt; 2017 May; 56(15):4330-4337. PubMed ID: 29047857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified subaperture tool influence functions of a flat-pitch polisher with reverse-calculated material removal rate.
    Dong Z; Cheng H; Tam HY
    Appl Opt; 2014 Apr; 53(11):2455-64. PubMed ID: 24787418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An application of the SMS method for imaging designs.
    Miñano JC; Benítez P; Lin W; Infante J; Muñoz F; Santamaría A
    Opt Express; 2009 Dec; 17(26):24036-44. PubMed ID: 20052116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of different secondary optical elements for aspheric primary lenses.
    Victoria M; Domínguez C; Antón I; Sala G
    Opt Express; 2009 Apr; 17(8):6487-92. PubMed ID: 19365473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting thermal displacements in modular tool systems.
    Wessel N; Konvicka J; Weidermann F; Nestmann S; Neugebauer R; Schwarz U; Wessel A; Kurths J
    Chaos; 2004 Mar; 14(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15003041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Alvarez and Lohmann refractive lenses revisited.
    Barbero S
    Opt Express; 2009 May; 17(11):9376-90. PubMed ID: 19466190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the setup dependence of detector response functions for mega-voltage linear accelerators.
    Fox C; Simon T; Simon B; Dempsey JF; Kahler D; Palta JR; Liu C; Yan G
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):477-84. PubMed ID: 20229856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Edges in CNC polishing: from mirror-segments towards semiconductors, paper 1: edges on processing the global surface.
    Walker D; Yu G; Li H; Messelink W; Evans R; Beaucamp A
    Opt Express; 2012 Aug; 20(18):19787-98. PubMed ID: 23037031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling and optimization of micro optofluidic lenses.
    Song C; Nguyen NT; Tan SH; Asundi AK
    Lab Chip; 2009 May; 9(9):1178-84. PubMed ID: 19370234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rigid conformal polishing tool using non-linear visco-elastic effect.
    Kim DW; Burge JH
    Opt Express; 2010 Feb; 18(3):2242-57. PubMed ID: 20174053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removal of millimeter-scale rolled edges using bevel-cut-like tool influence function in magnetorheological jet polishing.
    Yang H; Cheng H; Feng Y; Jing X
    Appl Opt; 2018 May; 57(13):3377-3384. PubMed ID: 29726504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of surface manufacturing error of cubic phase mask in wavefront coding system.
    Chang CC; Lee CC
    Opt Express; 2009 Apr; 17(8):6245-51. PubMed ID: 19365449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling and prediction of tool influence function under complex edge in sub-aperture optical polishing.
    Wan S; Wei C; Hu C; Gu H; Shao J
    Opt Express; 2021 Jul; 29(15):23582-23596. PubMed ID: 34614622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative assessment of freeform polynomials as optical surface descriptions.
    Kaya I; Thompson KP; Rolland JP
    Opt Express; 2012 Sep; 20(20):22683-91. PubMed ID: 23037418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.