These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19333746)

  • 1. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination and instructional comprehension: guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):337-58. PubMed ID: 10846376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing.
    Beckham CM; Spray BJ; Pietz CA
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 147(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 17703790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
    Peter-Hagene L
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy.
    Cox J; DeMatteo DS; Foster EE
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):878-91. PubMed ID: 20824653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Religious characteristics and the death penalty.
    Miller MK; Hayward RD
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 17546480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Getting to the point: attempting to improve juror comprehension of capital penalty phase instructions.
    Smith AE; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):339-50. PubMed ID: 20936335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials.
    Shaked-Schroer N; Costanzo M; Marcus-Newhall A
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(5):603-17. PubMed ID: 18788078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
    Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting the Decision of Death in Hurst v. Florida.
    Cooke BK; Ginory A; Zedalis J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 28003393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.
    Greene E; Cahill BS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 22213023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Possibility of death sentence has divergent effect on verdicts for Black and White defendants.
    Glaser J; Martin KD; Kahn KB
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 26146816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Juror Decision-making in Death Penalty Sentencing when Presented with Defendant's History of Child Abuse or Neglect.
    Bell Holleran LL; Vaughan TJ; Vandiver DM
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):742-766. PubMed ID: 28098410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.