BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19333766)

  • 21. Sexual selection and the evolution of genital shape and complexity in water striders.
    Rowe L; Arnqvist G
    Evolution; 2012 Jan; 66(1):40-54. PubMed ID: 22220863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Female genitalia can evolve more rapidly and divergently than male genitalia.
    Simmons LW; Fitzpatrick JL
    Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1312. PubMed ID: 30899023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microscale laser surgery reveals adaptive function of male intromittent genitalia.
    Polak M; Rashed A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 May; 277(1686):1371-6. PubMed ID: 20053645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The evolution of female genitalia.
    Sloan NS; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Sep; 32(9):882-899. PubMed ID: 31267594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How the length of genital parts affects copulation performance in a carabid beetle: implications for correlated genital evolution between the sexes.
    Okuzaki Y; Sota T
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 24471576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapid divergent evolution of internal female genitalia and the coevolution of male genital morphology revealed by micro-computed tomography.
    Sloan NS; Harvey MS; Huey JA; Simmons LW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 291(2015):20232883. PubMed ID: 38290544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict.
    Brennan PL; Prum RO
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2015 Jul; 7(7):a017749. PubMed ID: 26134314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. COPULATORY BEHAVIOR, GENITAL MORPHOLOGY, AND MALE FERTILIZATION SUCCESS IN WATER STRIDERS.
    Arnqvist G; Danielsson I
    Evolution; 1999 Feb; 53(1):147-156. PubMed ID: 28565197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multivariate stabilizing sexual selection and the evolution of male and female genital morphology in the red flour beetle.
    House C; Tunstall P; Rapkin J; Bale MJ; Gage M; Del Castillo E; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2020 May; 74(5):883-896. PubMed ID: 31889313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.
    Simmons LW; García-González F
    Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2580-91. PubMed ID: 18691259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selection on an antagonistic behavioral trait can drive rapid genital coevolution in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    Hopwood PE; Head ML; Jordan EJ; Carter MJ; Davey E; Moore AJ; Royle NJ
    Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1180-8. PubMed ID: 27144373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Complex female genitalia indicate sperm dumping in armored goblin spiders (Arachnida, Araneae, Oonopidae).
    Burger M
    Zoology (Jena); 2010 Jan; 113(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 19939658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pre and Post-copulatory Selection Favor Similar Genital Phenotypes in the Male Broad Horned Beetle.
    House CM; Sharma MD; Okada K; Hosken DJ
    Integr Comp Biol; 2016 Oct; 56(4):682-93. PubMed ID: 27371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Female behaviour and the interaction of male and female genital traits mediate sperm transfer during mating.
    Friesen CR; Uhrig EJ; Mason RT; Brennan PL
    J Evol Biol; 2016 May; 29(5):952-64. PubMed ID: 26809830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The form of sexual selection on male genitalia cannot be inferred from within-population variance and allometry - a case study in Aquarius remigis.
    Bertin A; Fairbairn DJ
    Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):825-37. PubMed ID: 17439615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exaggerated male genitalia intensify interspecific reproductive interference by damaging heterospecific female genitalia.
    Kyogoku D; Sota T
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):1283-9. PubMed ID: 25882439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of sexually antagonistic genital morphologies on female reproduction and wild population demography.
    Takami Y; Fukuhara T; Yokoyama J; Kawata M
    Evolution; 2018 Nov; 72(11):2449-2461. PubMed ID: 30238547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Morphology and function of male genitalia (spermatophores) in Euscorpius italicus (Euscorpiidae, Scorpiones): complex spermatophore structures enable safe sperm transfer.
    Jacob A; Gantenbein I; Braunwalder ME; Nentwig W; Kropf C
    J Morphol; 2004 Apr; 260(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 15052598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Copulatory mechanism in a sexually cannibalistic spider with genital mutilation (Araneae: Araneidae: Argiope bruennichi).
    Uhl G; Nessler SH; Schneider J
    Zoology (Jena); 2007; 110(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 17869076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evolution of asymmetric genitalia in spiders and insects.
    Huber BA; Sinclair BJ; Schmitt M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):647-98. PubMed ID: 17944621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.