These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19333842)

  • 21. Seeking health care information: most consumers still on the sidelines.
    Tu HT; Hargraves JL
    Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 2003 Mar; (61):1-4. PubMed ID: 12647763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Questionnaire survey of California consumers' use and rating of sources of health care information including the Internet.
    Pennbridge J; Moya R; Rodrigues L
    West J Med; 1999; 171(5-6):302-5. PubMed ID: 10639865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do employees use report cards to assess health care provider systems?
    Schultz J; Thiede Call K; Feldman R; Christianson J
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Jul; 36(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 11482587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Polypharmacy in nursing home residents in the United States: results of the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey.
    Dwyer LL; Han B; Woodwell DA; Rechtsteiner EA
    Am J Geriatr Pharmacother; 2010 Feb; 8(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 20226393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The pay-off on nursing home report cards.
    Werner RM; Polsky D; Konetzka RT
    LDI Issue Brief; 2011 Apr; 16(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 21688691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A temporary home to nurture health: lived experiences of older nursing home residents in Taiwan.
    Tsai HH; Tsai YF
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jul; 17(14):1915-22. PubMed ID: 18578764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medicaid nursing home pay for performance: where do we stand?
    Arling G; Job C; Cooke V
    Gerontologist; 2009 Oct; 49(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 19458344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nursing home social services directors' opinions about the number of residents they can serve.
    Bern-Klug M; Kramer KW; Sharr P; Cruz I
    J Aging Soc Policy; 2010 Jan; 22(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 20390711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Nursing Home Compare Report Card: Perceptions of Residents and Caregivers Regarding Quality Ratings and Nursing Home Choice.
    Schapira MM; Shea JA; Duey KA; Kleiman C; Werner RM
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Jun; 51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1212-28. PubMed ID: 26867949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part I.
    Moore ST; Bopp KD
    Health Mark Q; 1999; 16(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 11066713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Consumer Rankings With Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Five-Star Rankings of Nursing Homes.
    Mukamel DB; Weimer DL; Shi Y; Ladd H; Saliba D
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e204798. PubMed ID: 32407503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nursing home compare: web site offers critical information to consumers, professionals.
    Fermazin M; Canady M; Bauer K; Cooper L
    Lippincotts Case Manag; 2003; 8(4):175-83. PubMed ID: 12897631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consumers' Interest In Provider Ratings Grows, And Improved Report Cards And Other Steps Could Accelerate Their Use.
    Findlay SD
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2016 Apr; 35(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 27044970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visibility and findability of the nursing home compare website.
    Liu D; Lu CJ
    Soc Work Public Health; 2015; 30(2):144-56. PubMed ID: 25491187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Case study: development of and stakeholder responses to a nursing home consumer information system.
    O'Meara J; Kitchener M; Collier E; Lyons M; de Billwiller-Kiss A; Simon LP; Harrington C
    Am J Med Qual; 2005; 20(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 15782754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of consumer involvement on satisfaction with and use of assistive technology.
    Martin JK; Martin LG; Stumbo NJ; Morrill JH
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2011; 6(3):225-42. PubMed ID: 20929425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Report cards and nursing homes.
    Castle NG; Lowe TJ
    Gerontologist; 2005 Feb; 45(1):48-67. PubMed ID: 15695417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationships between steps taken in selecting a nursing home and consumers' satisfaction.
    Prawitz A; Lawrence F; Draughn P; Wozniak P
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Oct; 69(2):404-6. PubMed ID: 1763156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of the Internet on quality measurement.
    Bates DW; Gawande AA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2000; 19(6):104-14. PubMed ID: 11192393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.