These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1933394)

  • 41. Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component.
    Gage N; Roberts TP; Hickok G
    Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 1069(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 16403467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Contralaterality of cortical auditory processing at the level of the M50/M100 complex and the mismatch field: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study.
    Ackermann H; Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W
    Neuroreport; 2001 Jun; 12(8):1683-7. PubMed ID: 11409739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sex differences in the refractory period of the 100 ms auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Rojas DC; Teale P; Sheeder J; Reite M
    Neuroreport; 1999 Nov; 10(16):3321-5. PubMed ID: 10599839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds.
    Gage N; Poeppel D; Roberts TP; Hickok G
    Brain Res; 1998 Dec; 814(1-2):236-9. PubMed ID: 9838140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hemispheric differences on auditory evoked response suppression in schizophrenia.
    Blumenfeld LD; Clementz BA
    Neuroreport; 1999 Aug; 10(12):2587-91. PubMed ID: 10574374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of gender and personality traits on individual difference in auditory mismatch: a magnetoencephalographic (MMNm) study.
    Matsubayashi J; Kawakubo Y; Suga M; Takei Y; Kumano S; Fukuda M; Itoh K; Yumoto M; Kasai K
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():159-65. PubMed ID: 18725215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Altered neural synchronization to pure tone stimulation in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: An MEG study.
    Matsubara T; Ogata K; Hironaga N; Kikuchi Y; Uehara T; Chatani H; Mitsudo T; Shigeto H; Tobimatsu S
    Epilepsy Behav; 2018 Nov; 88():96-105. PubMed ID: 30243112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical standardization for the detection of hemispheric dominance for steady-state auditory evoked fields in normal hearing.
    Wang MC; Chi TS; Shiao AS; Li LP; Hsieh JC
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2023 Nov; 86(11):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 37713316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications.
    Chait M; Simon JZ; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 2004 Nov; 15(16):2455-8. PubMed ID: 15538173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Linear coding of voice onset time.
    Frye RE; Fisher JM; Coty A; Zarella M; Liederman J; Halgren E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 19(9):1476-87. PubMed ID: 17714009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Lateralization of auditory sensory gating and neuropsychological dysfunction in schizophrenia.
    Thoma RJ; Hanlon FM; Moses SN; Edgar JC; Huang M; Weisend MP; Irwin J; Sherwood A; Paulson K; Bustillo J; Adler LE; Miller GA; Cañive JM
    Am J Psychiatry; 2003 Sep; 160(9):1595-605. PubMed ID: 12944333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Schizoaffective disorder - a possible MEG auditory evoked field biomarker.
    Reite M; Teale P; Collins D; Rojas DC
    Psychiatry Res; 2010 Jun; 182(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 20488676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Temporal integration: reflections in the M100 of the auditory evoked field.
    Gage NM; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 2000 Aug; 11(12):2723-6. PubMed ID: 10976951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Localization of the human language cortex by magnetic source imaging.
    Sun J; Wu J; Li S; Wu Y; Liu L
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jul; 116(7):1039-42. PubMed ID: 12890379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency.
    Stufflebeam SM; Poeppel D; Rowley HA; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 1998 Jan; 9(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 9592054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Transient and phase-locked evoked magnetic fields in response to periodic acoustic signals.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jul; 15(10):1687-90. PubMed ID: 15232308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Discrimination of timbre in early auditory responses of the human brain.
    Seol J; Oh M; Kim JS; Jin SH; Kim SI; Chung CK
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24959. PubMed ID: 21949807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 6():62. PubMed ID: 16225699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis.
    Edgar JC; Blaskey L; Green HL; Konka K; Shen G; Dipiero MA; Berman JI; Bloy L; Liu S; McBride E; Ku M; Kuschner ES; Airey M; Kim M; Franzen RE; Miller GA; Roberts TPL
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():584557. PubMed ID: 33329127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.