These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19335578)

  • 1. Experiences of the multiple mini-interview: a qualitative analysis.
    Kumar K; Roberts C; Rothnie I; du Fresne C; Walton M
    Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 43(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 19335578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school.
    Roberts C; Walton M; Rothnie I; Crossley J; Lyon P; Kumar K; Tiller D
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 18338992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validating a multiple mini-interview question bank assessing entry-level reasoning skills in candidates for graduate-entry medicine and dentistry programmes.
    Roberts C; Zoanetti N; Rothnie I
    Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 43(4):350-9. PubMed ID: 19335577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Trinh K; Wasi P; Rosenfeld J; Norman GR
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 19659490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection.
    Hofmeister M; Lockyer J; Crutcher R
    Fam Med; 2008; 40(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 18979262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discerning quality: using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School.
    Harris S; Owen C
    Med Educ; 2007 Mar; 41(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 17316207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MOR: a simulation-based assessment centre for evaluating the personal and interpersonal qualities of medical school candidates.
    Ziv A; Rubin O; Moshinsky A; Gafni N; Kotler M; Dagan Y; Lichtenberg D; Mekori YA; Mittelman M
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):991-8. PubMed ID: 18823518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.
    Kim KJ; Nam KS; Kwon BS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 29(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 28264549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contribution of medical students to admission interviews.
    Koc T; Katona C; Rees PJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Mar; 42(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 18221267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability estimates: behavioural stations and questionnaires in medical school admissions.
    Gafni N; Moshinsky A; Eisenberg O; Zeigler D; Ziv A
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):277-88. PubMed ID: 22324527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.
    Brownell K; Lockyer J; Collin T; Lemay JF
    Med Teach; 2007 May; 29(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 17786758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internet-based multiple mini-interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes.
    Tiller D; O'Mara D; Rothnie I; Dunn S; Lee L; Roberts C
    Med Educ; 2013 Aug; 47(8):801-10. PubMed ID: 23837426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should candidate scores be adjusted for interviewer stringency or leniency in the multiple mini-interview?
    Roberts C; Rothnie I; Zoanetti N; Crossley J
    Med Educ; 2010 Jul; 44(7):690-8. PubMed ID: 20636588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches.
    Knorr M; Hissbach J
    Med Educ; 2014 Dec; 48(12):1157-75. PubMed ID: 25413910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview.
    Kulasegaram K; Reiter HI; Wiesner W; Hackett RD; Norman GR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Aug; 15(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 20013153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why people apply to medical school: implications for widening participation activities.
    McHarg J; Mattick K; Knight LV
    Med Educ; 2007 Aug; 41(8):815-21. PubMed ID: 17661890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Trinh K; Wood TJ; Norman GR
    JAMA; 2012 Dec; 308(21):2233-40. PubMed ID: 23212501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.