These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19335870)

  • 41. Inappropriate ICD discharges due to noise oversensing as the first sign of repetitive perforations of the right ventricular lead.
    Ueda-Tatsumoto A; Fukamizu S; Nishizaki M; Sakurada H; Hiraoka M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Nov; 32(11):1481-4. PubMed ID: 19712072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Performance of an ICD algorithm to detect lead noise and reduce inappropriate shocks.
    Beau S; Greer S; Ellis CR; Keeney J; Asopa S; Arnold E; Fischer A
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 45(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 26739482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure in children and young adults: a matter of lead diameter or lead design?
    Janson CM; Patel AR; Bonney WJ; Smoots K; Shah MJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 63(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24140671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) were removed from the market in October 2007 because of the rate of pace-sense conductor fractures.
    Arias MA; Puchol A; Castellanos E; Pachón M
    Heart Rhythm; 2009 Jan; 6(1):e6-7; author reply e7. PubMed ID: 19121790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Increasing hazard of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure.
    Hauser RG; Hayes DL
    Heart Rhythm; 2009 May; 6(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 19285920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of longevity and clinical outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads among manufacturers.
    Kawada S; Nishii N; Morimoto Y; Miyoshi A; Tachibana M; Sugiyama H; Nakagawa K; Watanabe A; Morita H; Ito H
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Oct; 14(10):1496-1503. PubMed ID: 28502870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Risk of Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead failure is highly dependent on age.
    Girerd N; Nonin E; Pinot J; Morel E; Flys C; Scridon A; Chevalier P
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2011; 104(6-7):388-95. PubMed ID: 21798471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impact of implanted recalled sprint Fidelis lead on patient mortality.
    Morrison TB; Friedman PA; Kallinen LM; Hodge DO; Crusan D; Kumar K; Hayes DL; Rea RF; Hauser RG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 58(3):278-83. PubMed ID: 21737019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure.
    Faulknier BA; Traub DM; Aktas MK; Aguila A; Rosero S; Daubert JP; Hall B; Shah A; Taylor S; McNitt S; Moss AJ; Zareba W; Huang DT
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Jan; 105(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 20102898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Detection of repolarization alternans with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead in a porcine model.
    Maybhate A; Hao SC; Iwai S; Lee JU; Guttigoli AB; Stein KM; Lerman BB; Christini DJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1188-94. PubMed ID: 16041982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An unusual mechanism causing inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks: transient reduction in R-wave amplitude.
    Baranchuk A; Ribas S; Divakaramenon S; Morillo CA
    Europace; 2007 Aug; 9(8):694-6. PubMed ID: 17478463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical performance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead monitoring diagnostics.
    Poole JE; Swerdlow CD; Tarakji KG; Mittal S; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Kennergren C; Philbert BT; Moore J; Jones RC; Schaller RD; Hansalia R; Simmers T; Mihalcz A; DeBus B; Lexcen DR; Gunderson B; Wilkoff BL
    Heart Rhythm; 2022 Mar; 19(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 34767985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Utility of implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrograms to estimate repolarization alternans preceding a tachyarrhythmic event.
    Armoundas AA; Albert CM; Cohen RJ; Mela T;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 15(5):594-7. PubMed ID: 15149432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance of dedicated versus integrated bipolar defibrillator leads with CRT-defibrillators: results from a Prospective Multicenter Study.
    Freedman RA; Petrakian A; Boyce K; Haffajee C; Val-Mejias JE; Oza AL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Feb; 32(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 19170903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Acute hyperkalemia detected by alert from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
    Kuriachan V; Tedrow U; Antman E; Epstein LM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Sep; 35(9):e276-9. PubMed ID: 22817110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Tools and strategies for the reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks.
    Tzeis S; Andrikopoulos G; Kolb C; Vardas PE
    Europace; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1256-65. PubMed ID: 18708639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Very late stent thrombosis immediately after recurrent inappropriate shock delivery by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
    Groarke J; Phelan D; Burke D; Crean P; Foley B
    J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 22197106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Diagnosis of high-voltage conductor fractures in Sprint Fidelis leads.
    Koneru JN; Gunderson BD; Sachanandani H; Wohl BN; Kendall KT; Swerdlow CD; Ellenbogen KA
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jun; 10(6):813-8. PubMed ID: 23454808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Necessity for surgical revision of defibrillator leads implanted long-term: causes and management.
    Eckstein J; Koller MT; Zabel M; Kalusche D; Schaer BA; Osswald S; Sticherling C
    Circulation; 2008 May; 117(21):2727-33. PubMed ID: 18490526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impedance changes on defibrillation coils after atrial fibrillation ablation: lead damage or electromechanical interference?
    Vanga SR; Bommana S; Kroll M; Lakkireddy D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 35(6):e163-6. PubMed ID: 21029124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.