These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1933679)
1. The surgeon and the nurse share the blame: a case of a retained sponge. Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1991; 9(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 1933679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurse and the law. More on foreign bodies. Langslow A Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jul; 22(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 1530525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Can doctors rely on nurses' sponge counts? Case in point: Van Hook v. Anderson (824 P. 2d 509--WA (1992)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):2. PubMed ID: 1603936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse and the law. Relying on the count. Langslow A Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jun; 21(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 1530515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgeon attempts to blame nurses for sponge left in mastectomy patient. Case on point: Mitchell v. Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr., 2003 WL 21508493 S.W.3d-TX. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Aug; 44(3):2. PubMed ID: 14508919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal case briefs for nurses. IA: unattended pt. falls in bathroom: "routine nonmedicale care" standard applied; OR: nurses state "all sponges ... removed": court rejects "captain of ship" doctrine. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Nov; 34(6):3. PubMed ID: 8265796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sponge left in pt. - Dr. settled: hospital sued for OR nurses' negligence. Savage v. Three Rivers Medical Center, C-000348-DG KYSC---S.W.3d---(10/25/2012)-KY. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Dec; 53(7):1. PubMed ID: 23383465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Taking the blame. Kellett J Nurs Stand; 1996 Dec; 11(12):21-3. PubMed ID: 8974248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lawsuits and nurses. McLean PA AARN News Lett; 1994 Feb; 50(2):9. PubMed ID: 8154242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dividing the responsible pie. Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA Can Crit Care Nurs J; 1987; 4(3):16-7. PubMed ID: 3690382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The nurse and the law. Finding homes for problems. Langslow A Aust Nurses J; 1983 Oct; 13(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 6559063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. LA: Judgment for defendants reversed: fact issues for jury precluded summary action. Gleason v. Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, 031010 LACA2,44,947-CA (3/19/2010)-LA. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):3. PubMed ID: 20503498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurse and the law. Legal commentary on the nurse's role. Langslow A Aust Nurses J; 1992 May; 21(10):29-30. PubMed ID: 1497543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Doctor sues nurse for falsifying records. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Dec; 28(7):1. PubMed ID: 3423264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of a claim in a medical malpractice case. Resh C Natl Med Leg J; 1991; 2(2):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 1747429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]