561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19336803)
1. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Kubinec V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Lucht U
Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Oct; 71(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 11186396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Operating time and survival of primary total hip replacements: an analysis of 31,745 primary cemented and uncemented total hip replacements from local hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-2001.
Småbrekke A; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Furnes O
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Oct; 75(5):524-32. PubMed ID: 15513482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Tyson Y; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Mohaddes M
Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 31154890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Herberts P; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Mäkela K; Eskelinen A; Overgaard S
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 24631923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult.
Callaghan JJ; Forest EE; Sporer SM; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):257-62. PubMed ID: 9372776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties.
Havelin LI; Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Furnes O; Lie SA; Vollset SE
Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Aug; 71(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 11028881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.
Wechter J; Comfort TK; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3588-95. PubMed ID: 23873609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
Digas G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening--a status assessment].
Wirtz DC; Niethard FU
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):270-80. PubMed ID: 9381761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost savings of using a cemented total hip replacement: an analysis of the National Joint Registry data.
Griffiths EJ; Stevenson D; Porteous MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1032-5. PubMed ID: 22844042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
