232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19336857)
1. A comparison of stress distribution and flexion among various designs of bar attachments for implant overdentures: a three dimensional finite element analysis.
Prakash V; D'Souza M; Adhikari R
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 19336857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overdenture retaining bar stress distribution: a finite-element analysis.
Caetano CR; Mesquita MF; Consani RL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Dos Santos MB
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25645607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of implant number and position on the stress behavior of mandibular implant retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Topkaya T; Solmaz MY
J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2102-9. PubMed ID: 25862522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-supported overdentures with different clinical configurations: Mechanical resistance using a numerical approach.
de la Rosa Castolo G; Guevara Perez SV; Arnoux PJ; Badih L; Bonnet F; Behr M
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):546.e1-546.e10. PubMed ID: 30711289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distribution of one-piece and two-piece mini-Implant overdentures with various attachment systems and diameters: A finite element analysis.
Trang BNH; Kanazawa M; Murakami N; Wakabayashi N; Hada T; Sahaprom N; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 36372437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
