These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19336857)

  • 21. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
    Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Complications with computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured titanium and soldered gold bars for mandibular implant-overdentures: short-term observations.
    Katsoulis J; Wälchli J; Kobel S; Gholami H; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e75-85. PubMed ID: 23915228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
    Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of overdenture retention designs and implant orientations on load transfer characteristics.
    Federick DR; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 8957789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular ball-supported and bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element analysis.
    Vafaei F; Khoshhal M; Bayat-Movahed S; Ahangary AH; Firooz F; Izady A; Rakhshan V
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 20712443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of stress distribution in overdenture-retaining bar with different levels of vertical misfit.
    Spazzin AO; Abreu RT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 21658152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: a computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis.
    Arat Bilhan S; Baykasoglu C; Bilhan H; Kutay O; Mugan A
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 25443880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experimental and numerical investigations of fracture and fatigue behaviour of implant-supported bars with distal extension made of three different materials.
    Mochalski J; Fröhls C; Keilig L; Bourauel C; Dörsam I
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2021 Jun; 66(3):305-316. PubMed ID: 34062636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: an in vitro comparison of ball, bar, and magnetic attachments.
    Manju V; Sreelal T
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 22891704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of the attachment type and implant number supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: an in vitro study, part I.
    Arat Bilhan S; Bilhan H; Bozdag E; Sunbuloglu E; Baykasoglu C; Kutay O
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 23296030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 3D Finite Element Analysis to Assess the Stress Distribution Pattern in Mandibular Implant-supported Overdenture with Different Bar Heights.
    Joshi S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 31597798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.