These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19339303)

  • 1. Evaluation of doses from ionising radiation to non-human species at Trombay, Mumbai, India.
    Singhal RK; Ajay K; Usha N; Reddy AV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 19339303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Derivation of a screening methodology for evaluating radiation dose to aquatic and terrestrial biota.
    Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ; Kocher DC
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):41-59. PubMed ID: 12590069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the ERICA Assessment Tool to freshwater biota in Finland.
    Vetikko V; Saxén R
    J Environ Radioact; 2010 Jan; 101(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 19828217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A probabilistic approach to obtaining limiting estimates of radionuclide concentration in biota.
    Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):75-87. PubMed ID: 12590071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of radiological significance of naturally occurring radionuclides in soil and rock matrices around Kakrapar environment.
    Patra AK; Jaison TJ; Baburajan A; Hegde AG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 18658174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural radioactivity and radiation exposure in the high background area at Chhatrapur beach placer deposit of Orissa, India.
    Mohanty AK; Sengupta D; Das SK; Saha SK; Van KV
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 75(1):15-33. PubMed ID: 15149759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of natural radioactivity and dose rate assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation in the soil of southern Punjab, Pakistan.
    Fatima I; Zaidi JH; Arif M; Daud M; Ahmad SA; Tahir SN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 17526482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Significance of 14C and 228Ra in terms of the proposed Yucca Mountain high-level radioactive waste repository.
    Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Cherry RN; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2006 Sep; 91(3):238-48. PubMed ID: 16891899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Principles and issues in radiological ecological risk assessment.
    Jones D; Domotor S; Higley K; Kocher D; Bilyard G
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):19-39. PubMed ID: 12590068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radioactivity of the Bega sediment-case study of a contaminated canal.
    Bikit I; Varga E; Conkić Lj; Slivka J; Mrda D; Curcić S; Zikić-Todorović N; Vesković M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Aug; 63(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 15946851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of 25 y of environmental monitoring data around Madras Atomic Power Station (MAPS), Kalpakkam, India.
    Rajaram S; Brindha JT; Sreedevi KR; Manu A; Thilakavathi A; Ramkumar S; Santhanakrishnan V; Balagurunathan MR; Jesan T; Kannan V; Hegde AG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):314-23. PubMed ID: 20829204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Background exposure rates of terrestrial wildlife in England and Wales.
    Beresford NA; Barnett CL; Jones DG; Wood MD; Appleton JD; Breward N; Copplestone D
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1430-9. PubMed ID: 18440107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying DOE's Graded Approach for assessing radiation impacts to non-human biota at the INL.
    Morris RC
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):77-100. PubMed ID: 16459178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. (226)Ra, (232)Th and (40)K contents in soil samples from Garhwal Himalaya, India, and its radiological implications.
    Ramola RC; Gusain GS; Badoni M; Prasad Y; Prasad G; Ramachandran TV
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 18714132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of radiation doses from (137)Cs to frogs in a wetland ecosystem.
    Stark K; Avila R; Wallberg P
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 75(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15149758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of background radioactivity level for Gaziantep region of southeastern Turkey.
    Osmanlioglu AE; Kam E; Bozkurt A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 17525056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sea to land transfer of anthropogenic radionuclides to the North Wales coast, Part II: aerial modelling and radiological assessment.
    Hill R; Bryan SE; McDonald P; Wilson RC; Smith AD
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Jan; 99(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 17888548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sea to land transfer of anthropogenic radionuclides to the North Wales coast, Part I: external gamma radiation and radionuclide concentrations in intertidal sediments, soil and air.
    Bryan SE; McDonald P; Hill R; Wilson RC
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Jan; 99(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 17870217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the radiological hazards due to naturally occurring radionuclides in soil samples collected from the north western areas of Pakistan.
    Rahman S; Matiullah ; Mujahid SA; Hussain S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 17595207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental gamma radiation measurement in district Swat, Pakistan.
    Jabbar T; Khan K; Subhani MS; Akhter P; Jabbar A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 18936087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.