These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19340091)

  • 1. Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy.
    van Stralen KJ; Stel VS; Reitsma JB; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Jun; 75(12):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 19340091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.
    Menten J; Lesaffre E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():70. PubMed ID: 26315894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
    Valenstein PN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
    de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Latent class models in diagnostic studies when there is no reference standard--a systematic review.
    van Smeden M; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 179(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 24272278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spot protein-creatinine ratio and spot albumin-creatinine ratio in the assessment of pre-eclampsia: a diagnostic accuracy study with decision-analytic model-based economic evaluation and acceptability analysis.
    Waugh J; Hooper R; Lamb E; Robson S; Shennan A; Milne F; Price C; Thangaratinam S; Berdunov V; Bingham J
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Oct; 21(61):1-90. PubMed ID: 29064366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using and interpreting diagnostic tests.
    McKenna SL; Dohoo IR
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 22(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 16517302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
    Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verification bias in pediatric studies evaluating diagnostic tests.
    Bates AS; Margolis PA; Evans AT
    J Pediatr; 1993 Apr; 122(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 8463905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test.
    Kea B; Hall MK; Wang R
    Emerg Med J; 2019 Aug; 36(8):501-505. PubMed ID: 31221671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Academic calculations versus clinical judgments: practicing physicians' use of quantitative measures of test accuracy.
    Reid MC; Lane DA; Feinstein AR
    Am J Med; 1998 Apr; 104(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 9576412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
    Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic randomized controlled trials: the final frontier.
    Rodger M; Ramsay T; Fergusson D
    Trials; 2012 Aug; 13():137. PubMed ID: 22897974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.