These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19340845)

  • 1. Propensity scores and M-structures.
    Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1416-20; author reply 1420-3. PubMed ID: 19340845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
    Hong G
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reverse propensity score to detect selection bias and correct for baseline imbalances.
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2777-87. PubMed ID: 15981305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test.
    Luellen JK; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Eval Rev; 2005 Dec; 29(6):530-58. PubMed ID: 16244051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
    Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):20-36. PubMed ID: 17072897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal conclusions are most sensitive to unobserved binary covariates.
    Wang L; Krieger AM
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2257-71. PubMed ID: 16220480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating exposure effects by modelling the expectation of exposure conditional on confounders.
    Robins JM; Mark SD; Newey WK
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):479-95. PubMed ID: 1637973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.
    Rubin DB; Thomas N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):249-64. PubMed ID: 8934595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2062-5; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18286673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
    Steiner PM; Cook TD; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):250-67. PubMed ID: 20822251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1202-17. PubMed ID: 18972454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The concept of the marginally matched subject in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC; Lee DS
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Jun; 18(6):469-82. PubMed ID: 19319923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hill J
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2055-61; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18446836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remarks on the method of propensity score.
    Pearl J
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1415-6; author reply 1420-3. PubMed ID: 19340847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) - the application of causal diagrams in epidemiology].
    Schipf S; Knüppel S; Hardt J; Stang A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):888-92. PubMed ID: 22193898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hansen BB
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2050-4; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18407561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.