These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19340845)

  • 21. Propensity scores: from naive enthusiasm to intuitive understanding.
    Williamson E; Morley R; Lucas A; Carpenter J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Jun; 21(3):273-93. PubMed ID: 21262780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of propensity scores using generalized additive models.
    Woo MJ; Reiter JP; Karr AF
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3805-16. PubMed ID: 18366144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Case matching and the reduction of selection bias in quasi-experiments: The relative importance of pretest measures of outcome, of unreliable measurement, and of mode of data analysis.
    Cook TD; Steiner PM
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 20230103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of the principal stratification approach to the Faenza randomized experiment on breast self-examination.
    Mattei A; Mealli F
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):437-46. PubMed ID: 17688496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Extensions of the penalized spline of propensity prediction method of imputation.
    Zhang G; Little R
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):911-8. PubMed ID: 19053998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.
    Månsson R; Joffe MM; Sun W; Hennessy S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 166(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 17504780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Weighting regressions by propensity scores.
    Freedman DA; Berk RA
    Eval Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(4):392-409. PubMed ID: 18591709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".
    Small DS; Cheng J
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):682-6; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Discussions.
    Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):686-9; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Basics of using the DAG programs].
    Knüppel S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):893-6. PubMed ID: 22193899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in control of confounding].
    Xiang R; Dai WJ; Xiong Y; Wu X; Yang YF; Wang L; Dai ZH; Li J; Liu AZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1035-8. PubMed ID: 27453119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Blinded assessment of treatment effects utilizing information about the randomization block length.
    Miller F; Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(12):1690-706. PubMed ID: 19340815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Re-estimating the sample size of an on-going blinded trial based on the method of randomization block sums.
    Ganju J; Xing B
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 18837073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methods of covariate selection: directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure.
    Weng HY; Hsueh YH; Messam LL; Hertz-Picciotto I
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 May; 169(10):1182-90. PubMed ID: 19363102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Our moral ancestors: determining adjustment sets in causal diagrams with ease].
    Textor J
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):897-900. PubMed ID: 22193900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Propensity scores do not necessarily lie!
    Vergouwe Y; van Klei WA; Kalkman CJ; Moons KG
    Anesthesiology; 2008 Oct; 109(4):746-7; author reply 747. PubMed ID: 18813057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.