These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19340847)

  • 1. Remarks on the method of propensity score.
    Pearl J
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1415-6; author reply 1420-3. PubMed ID: 19340847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity scores and M-structures.
    Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1416-20; author reply 1420-3. PubMed ID: 19340845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
    Chan KC
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case-only analysis of treatment-covariate interactions in clinical trials.
    Vittinghoff E; Bauer DC
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):769-76. PubMed ID: 16984319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.
    Little RJ; Rubin DB
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2000; 21():121-45. PubMed ID: 10884949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of clinical data with breached blindness.
    Chow SC; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1185-93. PubMed ID: 15083477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
    Hong G
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
    Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):20-36. PubMed ID: 17072897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discussions.
    Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):686-9; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.
    Yi Y; Wang X
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):763-73. PubMed ID: 19757432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".
    Small DS; Cheng J
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):682-6; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Biometrical principles in medicine].
    Löffler M
    Med Klin (Munich); 1998 Sep; 93(9):571-6. PubMed ID: 9792027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discussion: “Bayesian enrichment strategies for randomized discontinuation trials”.
    Perevozskaya I
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):217-8; discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 21714783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The analysis of binary and categorical data from crossover trials.
    Kenward MG; Jones B
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994 Dec; 3(4):325-44. PubMed ID: 7889226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
    Shrier I
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2740-1; author reply 2741-2. PubMed ID: 18069729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.