These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19340877)

  • 21. Influence of cement stiffness and bone morphology on the compressive properties of bone-cement composites in simulated vertebroplasty.
    Helgason B; Stirnimann P; Widmer R; Boger A; Ferguson SJ
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Feb; 101(2):364-74. PubMed ID: 23165791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experimental and computational models to investigate the effect of adhesion on the mechanical properties of bone-cement composites.
    Helgason B; Stirnimann P; Widmer R; Ferguson SJ
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2011 Oct; 99(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 21714083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modelling cement augmentation: a comparative experimental and finite element study at the continuum level.
    Zhao Y; Jin ZM; Wilcox RK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(7):903-11. PubMed ID: 20839657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Residual stresses at the stem-cement interface of an idealized cemented hip stem.
    Nuño N; Avanzolini G
    J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):849-52. PubMed ID: 12021006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
    Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shear fatigue micromechanics of the cement-bone interface: An in vitro study using digital image correlation techniques.
    Mann KA; Miller MA; Race A; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Mar; 27(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 18846550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Strain shielding in trabecular bone at the tibial cement-bone interface.
    Srinivasan P; Miller MA; Verdonschot N; Mann KA; Janssen D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Feb; 66():181-186. PubMed ID: 27889526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does increased bone-cement interface strength have negative consequences for bulk cement integrity? A finite element study.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 37(3):454-66. PubMed ID: 19085106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stress shielding in bone of a bone-cement interface.
    Zhang QH; Cossey A; Tong J
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Apr; 38(4):423-6. PubMed ID: 26904919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods.
    Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Boogaard GJ; Toni A
    J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 14672564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modelling debonded stem-cement interface for hip implants: effect of residual stresses.
    Nuño N; Amabili M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jan; 17(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11779645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
    Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Axisymmetric finite element analysis of a debonded total hip stem with an unsupported distal tip.
    Norman TL; Saligrama VC; Hustosky KT; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 8872263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1569-75. PubMed ID: 8945655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mixed-mode loading of the cement-bone interface: a finite element study.
    Waanders D; Janssen D; Bertoldi K; Mann KA; Verdonschot N
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Feb; 14(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 21170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pre-yield and post-yield shear behavior of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 9671933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.