These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19340991)

  • 21. The neurocranial and craniofacial morphology in children with solitary median maxillary central incisor (SMMCI).
    Tabatabaie F; Sonnesen L; Kjaer I
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 18416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions.
    Hering K; Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 10515146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Lateral development of the dental arch in overbite].
    Bieber K
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1973 Aug; 23(8):545-53. PubMed ID: 4520549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
    Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [A quantitative study of the transverse displacement of the premaxilla and the mandibular symphysis].
    Danguy M; Danguy-Derot C; Van Besien Y; Delachapelle C
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():415-9. PubMed ID: 3271961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Combination of maxillary and mandibular inclination in children with skeletal Class I, II and III relationship].
    Tijanić LJ; Janosević M
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 2638166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The compensatory mechanism in high-angle malocclusions: a comparison of subjects in the mixed and permanent dentition.
    Betzenberger D; Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10022181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
    Das UM; Reddy D
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential diagnosis of skeletal open bite based on sagittal components of the face.
    Arat ZM; Işeri H; Arman A
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15794041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction.
    Hans MG; Kishiyama C; Parker SH; Wolf GR; Noachtar R
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):265-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 7978521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment.
    Yogosawa F
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 2389852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Changes in overjet and overbite after orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class II (Angle C1. II div. 1) in Japanese females].
    Hasegawa M; Anezaki K; Mitani H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Sep; 43(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 6596338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Cephalometric "normal values" for the position of the incisors--a possible cause of failure in orthodontic treatments?].
    Schopf P
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1988 Feb; 49(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 3163671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mandibular incisor stability after orthodontic treatment in the upper arch.
    Brenchley ML
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 12(4):470. PubMed ID: 2086267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do you base your treatment plan on the position of the upper incisors or the lower incisors, and in relationship to what landmark?
    Sheridan JJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2003 Oct; 37(10):543-4. PubMed ID: 14628842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Profile and skeletal analyses--a comparison of different assessment procedures].
    Jung D; Schwarze CW; Tsutsumi S
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1984 Aug; 45(4):304-23. PubMed ID: 6592131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.