These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19341140)

  • 1. Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection.
    Godvik IM; Loe LE; Vik JO; Veiberg V; Langvatn R; Mysterud A
    Ecology; 2009 Mar; 90(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 19341140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore.
    van Beest FM; Mysterud A; Loe LE; Milner JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jul; 79(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 20443990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linking trade-offs in habitat selection with the occurrence of functional responses for moose living in two nearby study areas.
    Mabille G; Dussault C; Ouellet JP; Laurian C
    Oecologia; 2012 Dec; 170(4):965-77. PubMed ID: 22729651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Habitat quality influences population distribution, individual space use and functional responses in habitat selection by a large herbivore.
    Bjørneraas K; Herfindal I; Solberg EJ; Sæther BE; van Moorter B; Rolandsen CM
    Oecologia; 2012 Jan; 168(1):231-43. PubMed ID: 21766188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large herbivores in novel ecosystems - Habitat selection by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a former brown-coal mining area.
    Müller A; Dahm M; Bøcher PK; Root-Bernstein M; Svenning JC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177431. PubMed ID: 28505192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate.
    Hebblewhite M; Merrill EH
    Ecology; 2009 Dec; 90(12):3445-54. PubMed ID: 20120812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential resource selection within shared habitat types across spatial scales in sympatric toads.
    Indermaur L; Winzeler T; Schmidt BR; Tockner K; Schaub M
    Ecology; 2009 Dec; 90(12):3430-44. PubMed ID: 20120811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human recreation affects spatio-temporal habitat use patterns in red deer (Cervus elaphus).
    Coppes J; Burghardt F; Hagen R; Suchant R; Braunisch V
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0175134. PubMed ID: 28467429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term density-dependent changes in habitat selection in red deer (Cervus elaphus).
    Pérez-Barbería FJ; Hooper RJ; Gordon IJ
    Oecologia; 2013 Nov; 173(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 23719900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Displacement Effects of Conservation Grazing on Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) Spatial Behaviour.
    Weiss F; Michler FU; Gillich B; Tillmann J; Ciuti S; Heurich M; Rieger S
    Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 70(5):763-779. PubMed ID: 35994055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What attracts elk onto cattle pasture? Implications for inter-species disease transmission.
    Pruvot M; Seidel D; Boyce MS; Musiani M; Massolo A; Kutz S; Orsel K
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Nov; 117(2):326-39. PubMed ID: 25218913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does local weather predict red deer home range size at different temporal scales?
    Rivrud IM; Loe LE; Mysterud A
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Nov; 79(6):1280-95. PubMed ID: 20636345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.
    Van Moorter B; Rolandsen CM; Basille M; Gaillard JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 25980987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating encounter-habitat relationships with scale-integrated resource selection functions.
    Egan ME; Gorman NT; Crews S; Eichholz MW; Skinner D; Schlichting PE; Rayl ND; Bergman EJ; Ellington EH; Bastille-Rousseau G
    J Anim Ecol; 2024 Aug; 93(8):1036-1048. PubMed ID: 38940070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual and Population Level Resource Selection Patterns of Mountain Lions Preying on Mule Deer along an Urban-Wildland Gradient.
    Benson JF; Sikich JA; Riley SP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158006. PubMed ID: 27411098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. LiDAR reveals a preference for intermediate visibility by a forest-dwelling ungulate species.
    Zong X; Wang T; Skidmore AK; Heurich M
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Jul; 92(7):1306-1319. PubMed ID: 36413028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies.
    Duchesne T; Fortin D; Courbin N
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):548-55. PubMed ID: 20202010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grazing by wild red deer can mitigate nutrient enrichment in protected semi-natural open habitats.
    Riesch F; Wichelhaus A; Tonn B; Meißner M; Rosenthal G; Isselstein J
    Oecologia; 2022 Jun; 199(2):471-485. PubMed ID: 35545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Woodland features determining home range size of roe deer.
    Lovari S; Serrao G; Mori E
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():115-120. PubMed ID: 28442429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linking landscape-scale differences in forage to ungulate nutritional ecology.
    Proffitt KM; Hebblewhite M; Peters W; Hupp N; Shamhart J
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2156-2174. PubMed ID: 27755722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.