These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19341375)

  • 1. Evaluation of combined direct-push methods used for aquifer model generation.
    Köber R; Hornbruch G; Leven C; Tischer L; Grossmann J; Dietrich P; Weiss H; Dahmke A
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(4):536-46. PubMed ID: 19341375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Filtration and transport of Bacillus subtilis spores and the F-RNA phage MS2 in a coarse alluvial gravel aquifer: implications in the estimation of setback distances.
    Pang L; Close M; Goltz M; Noonan M; Sinton L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Apr; 77(3):165-94. PubMed ID: 15763354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of tandem circulation wells to measure hydraulic conductivity without groundwater extraction.
    Goltz MN; Huang J; Close ME; Flintoft MJ; Pang L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):127-36. PubMed ID: 18674844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of groundwater flow patterns around a dual-screened groundwater circulation well.
    Johnson RL; Simon MA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):188-202. PubMed ID: 17428573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Key features of artificial aquifers for use in modeling contaminant transport.
    Close M; Bright J; Wang F; Pang L; Manning M
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):814-28. PubMed ID: 18657117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Permeability profiles in granular aquifers using flowmeters in direct-push wells.
    Paradis D; Lefebvre R; Morin RH; Gloaguen E
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):534-47. PubMed ID: 20880040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter.
    Butler JJ; Dietrich P; Wittig V; Christy T
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 17600571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integral quantification of contaminant mass flow rates in a contaminated aquifer: conditioning of the numerical inversion of concentration-time series.
    Herold M; Ptak T; Bayer-Raich M; Wendel T; Grathwohl P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 19167131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geophysical constraints on contaminant transport modeling in a heterogeneous fluvial aquifer.
    Bowling JC; Zheng C; Rodriguez AB; Harry DL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 May; 85(1-2):72-88. PubMed ID: 16574272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating hydraulic properties using a moving-model approach and multiple aquifer tests.
    Halford KJ; Yobbi D
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 16556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-resolution slug testing.
    Zemansky GM; McElwee CD
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 15819943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. General steady-state shape factor for a partially penetrating well.
    Zlotnik VA; Goss D; Duffield GM
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19732160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inherent limitations of hydraulic tomography.
    Bohling GC; Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):809-24. PubMed ID: 20860689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design of aquifer remediation systems: (1) describing hydraulic structure and NAPL architecture using tracers.
    Enfield CG; Wood AL; Espinoza FP; Brooks MC; Annable M; Rao PS
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Dec; 81(1-4):125-47. PubMed ID: 16213060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of small-scale low and high permeability layers using single well forced-gradient tracer tests: fluorescent dye imaging and modelling at the laboratory-scale.
    Barns GL; Thornton SF; Wilson RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():84-99. PubMed ID: 25478669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inverse modeling of coastal aquifers using tidal response and hydraulic tests.
    Alcolea A; Castro E; Barbieri M; Carrera J; Bea S
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(6):711-22. PubMed ID: 17973749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of heterogeneous aquifer transmissivity using an AE-based method.
    Janković I; Fiori A; Suribhatla R; Dagan G
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 16405467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluorescent dye imaging of the volume sampled by single well forced-gradient tracer tests evaluated in a laboratory-scale aquifer physical model.
    Barns GL; Wilson RD; Thornton SF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Feb; 128(1-4):58-70. PubMed ID: 22192345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct-push hydrostratigraphic profiling: coupling electrical logging and slug tests.
    Sellwood SM; Healey JM; Birk S; Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 15726921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing microbial degradation of o-xylene at field-scale from the reduction in mass flow rate combined with compound-specific isotope analyses.
    Peter A; Steinbach A; Liedl R; Ptak T; Michaelis W; Teutsch G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Jul; 71(1-4):127-54. PubMed ID: 15145565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.