BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19341583)

  • 1. Efficacy of SmearClear and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for smear layer removal in primary teeth.
    Nelson-Filho P; Leite Gde A; Fernandes PM; da Silva RA; Rueda JC
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 19341583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
    da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal.
    Khedmat S; Shokouhinejad N
    J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 18436043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.
    Naaman A; Kaloustian H; Ounsi HF; Naaman-Bou Abboud N; Ricci C; Medioni E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17211500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Hariharan VS; Nandlal B; Srilatha KT
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21273715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
    Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of manual dynamic activation on smear layer removal efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and SmearClear: an in vitro scanning electron microscopic study.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Mishra SK; Tewari RK; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Dec; 39(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 24279660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal.
    Wu L; Mu Y; Deng X; Zhang S; Zhou D
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 22341079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of different volumes of EDTA for final rinse on smear layer removal.
    Mello I; Robazza CR; Antoniazzi JH; Coil J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):e40-3. PubMed ID: 18718781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smear layer removal with different concentrations of EDTA-ethylenediamine mixtures.
    Aktener BO; Bilkay U
    J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 8360598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of shortened irrigation times with 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid on smear layer removal after rotary canal instrumentation.
    Saito K; Webb TD; Imamura GM; Goodell GG
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1011-4. PubMed ID: 18634937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of German chamomile (Marticaria recutita L.) extract and tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia L.) oil used as irrigants on removal of smear layer: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Sadr Lahijani MS; Raoof Kateb HR; Heady R; Yazdani D
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 16507072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smear layer removal by EGTA.
    Calt S; Serper A
    J Endod; 2000 Aug; 26(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 11199779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between high concentration EDTA (24%) and low concentration EDTA (3%) with surfactant upon removal of smear layer after rotary instrumentation: a SEM study.
    Daghustani M; Alhammadi A; Merdad K; Ohlin J; Erhardt F; Ahlquist M
    Swed Dent J; 2011; 35(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 21591595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparative study of root smear layer removal using different pH EDTA salts].
    Ma R; Liu Z; Zhu CL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Jun; 12(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 14661329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.