These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19342813)

  • 41. Utilisation of single added fatty acids by consortia of digester sludge in batch culture.
    Wagner AO; Gstrauntaler G; Illmer P
    Waste Manag; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1822-7. PubMed ID: 20558054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Production of biogas from municipal solid waste with domestic sewage.
    Elango D; Pulikesi M; Baskaralingam P; Ramamurthi V; Sivanesan S
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(1):301-4. PubMed ID: 16914265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Anaerobic treatment of distillery spent wash - a study on upflow anaerobic fixed film bioreactor.
    Acharya BK; Mohana S; Madamwar D
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(11):4621-6. PubMed ID: 17765535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mixing.
    Karim K; Thomas Klasson K; Hoffmann R; Drescher SR; Depaoli DW; Al-Dahhan MH
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Sep; 96(14):1607-12. PubMed ID: 15978994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased biogas production.
    Nges IA; Escobar F; Fu X; Björnsson L
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jan; 32(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21975301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of pre-aeration and inoculum on the start-up of batch thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste.
    Charles W; Walker L; Cord-Ruwisch R
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Apr; 100(8):2329-35. PubMed ID: 19128961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biogas production and valorization by means of a two-step biological process.
    Converti A; Oliveira RP; Torres BR; Lodi A; Zilli M
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(23):5771-6. PubMed ID: 19559603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of different mixing intensities during anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.
    Lindmark J; Eriksson P; Thorin E
    Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1391-7. PubMed ID: 24814768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Anaerobic bioconversion of organic waste into biogas by hot water treatment at near-critical conditions: application in bioregenerative life support.
    Lissens G; Verstraete W; Albrecht T; Brunner G; Lasseur C
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(2 Pt A):171-4. PubMed ID: 15296155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level in Sweden: scale, choice of substrate and utilisation rate most important parameters for financial feasibility.
    Svensson LM; Christensson K; Björnsson L
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2006 Jul; 29(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 16770592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Decentralized application of anaerobic digesters in small poultry farms: performance analysis of high rate self mixed anaerobic digester and conventional fixed dome anaerobic digester.
    Rao AG; Gandu B; Sandhya K; Kranti K; Ahuja S; Swamy YV
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():121-7. PubMed ID: 23867531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Ultrasonic pretreatment and subsequent anaerobic digestion under different operational conditions.
    Apul OG; Sanin FD
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Dec; 101(23):8984-92. PubMed ID: 20656479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Enhanced methane production from pig manure anaerobic digestion using fish and biodiesel wastes as co-substrates.
    Regueiro L; Carballa M; Alvarez JA; Lema JM
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Nov; 123():507-13. PubMed ID: 22940361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment--a literature review.
    Sakar S; Yetilmezsoy K; Kocak E
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Feb; 27(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 19220987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reactor configuration--Part I. Comparative process stability and efficiency of mesophilic anaerobic digestion.
    Kim M; Speece RE
    Environ Technol; 2002 Jun; 23(6):631-42. PubMed ID: 12118615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Kinetic investigations of methane co-fermentation of sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid wastes.
    Sosnowski P; Klepacz-Smolka A; Kaczorek K; Ledakowicz S
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Sep; 99(13):5731-7. PubMed ID: 18061439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: stability and performance.
    Dai X; Duan N; Dong B; Dai L
    Waste Manag; 2013 Feb; 33(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 23177568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of substrate concentration on dry mesophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW).
    Fernández J; Pérez M; Romero LI
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Sep; 99(14):6075-80. PubMed ID: 18255282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Biogas from energy crops--optimal pre-treatments and storage, co-digestion and energy balance in boreal conditions.
    Seppälä M; Paavola T; Lehtomäki A; Pakarinen O; Rintala J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(9):1857-63. PubMed ID: 19029729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Methane production from kitchen waste using Escherichia coli.
    Jayalakshmi S; Joseph K; Sukumaran V
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Apr; 49(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 18476402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.