These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19342994)

  • 1. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review.
    Man LX; Selber JC; Serletti JM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Sep; 124(3):752-764. PubMed ID: 19342994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lee KT; Mun GH
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
    Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
    Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
    Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
    Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.
    Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 10987463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
    Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction.
    Wang XL; Liu LB; Song FM; Wang QY
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 24902911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
    Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's recent experience.
    Nelson JA; Guo Y; Sonnad SS; Low DW; Kovach SJ; Wu LC; Serletti JM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 21042098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.
    Garvey PB; Clemens MW; Hoy AE; Smith B; Zhang H; Kronowitz SJ; Butler CE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 24469158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?
    Selber JC; Samra F; Bristol M; Sonnad SS; Vega S; Wu L; Serletti JM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 18626349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Thoma A; Veltri K; Khuthaila D; Rockwell G; Duku E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 May; 113(6):1650-61. PubMed ID: 15114125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cost effectiveness of the DIEP flap relative to the muscle-sparing TRAM flap in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Krishnan NM; Purnell C; Nahabedian MY; Freed GL; Nigriny JF; Rosen JM; Rosson GD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):948-958. PubMed ID: 25811560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using propensity score analysis to compare major complications between DIEP and free muscle-sparing TRAM flap breast reconstructions.
    Zhong T; Novak CB; Bagher S; Maass SWMC; Zhang J; Arad U; O'Neill AC; Metcalfe KA; Hofer SOP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):774-782. PubMed ID: 24675183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.