191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19343420)
21. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance.
Gallagher AG; Al-Akash M; Seymour NE; Satava RM
Surg Endosc; 2009 Dec; 23(12):2684-91. PubMed ID: 19067048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, magnetically anchored, and flexible endoscopic cameras in performance and workload between laparoscopic and single-incision surgery.
Arain NA; Cadeddu JA; Best SL; Roshek T; Chang V; Hogg DC; Bergs R; Fernandez R; Webb EM; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1170-80. PubMed ID: 22044976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons.
Neary PC; Boyle E; Delaney CP; Senagore AJ; Keane FB; Gallagher AG
Surg Endosc; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2301-9. PubMed ID: 18553207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does previous laparoscopic experience improve ability to perform single-incision laparoscopic surgery?
Lewis T; Aggarwal R; Kwasnicki R; Darzi A; Paraskeva P
Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1214-9. PubMed ID: 22179448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Construct Validity of a Novel Assessment System for Laparoscopic Suture Accuracy Based on Stereoscopy.
Xu S; Chen Y; Luo N; Zhong A; Yang K
World J Surg; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1358-1363. PubMed ID: 36864224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Toward construct validity for a novel sensorized instrument-based minimally invasive surgery simulation system.
Jayaraman S; Trejos AL; Naish MD; Lyle A; Patel RV; Schlachta CM
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1439-45. PubMed ID: 20976494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A multi-degree-of-freedom needle driver with a short tip and small shaft for pediatric laparoscopic surgery: in vivo assessment of multi-directional suturing on the vertical plane of the liver in rabbits.
Takazawa S; Ishimaru T; Fujii M; Harada K; Deie K; Fujishiro J; Sugita N; Mitsuishi M; Iwanaka T
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3646-53. PubMed ID: 26511118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of viewing axis on laparoscopic performance: a comparison of non-expert and expert laparoscopic surgeons.
Rhee R; Fernandez G; Bush R; Seymour NE
Surg Endosc; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2634-40. PubMed ID: 24853838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the Effect of Instrument Type on Transanal Endoscopic Surgery Learning Curves.
Teitelbaum EN; Arafat FO; Boller AM
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Aug; 26(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 27380616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Training With Curved Laparoscopic Instruments in Single-Port Setting Improves Performance Using Straight Instruments: A Prospective Randomized Simulation Study.
Lukovich P; Sionov VB; Kakucs T
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 26868318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons.
McNatt SS; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2001 Oct; 15(10):1085-9. PubMed ID: 11727075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Handheld laparoscopic robotized instrument: progress or challenge?
Feng J; Yang K; Zhang Z; Li M; Chen X; Yan Z; Du Z; Wang X
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):719-727. PubMed ID: 31209612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ramifications of single-port laparoscopic surgery: measuring differences in task performance using simulation.
Conway NE; Romanelli JR; Bush RW; Seymour NE
Surg Innov; 2014 Feb; 21(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 23980199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Augmented reality telementoring (ART) platform: a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a new surgical education technology.
Vera AM; Russo M; Mohsin A; Tsuda S
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3467-72. PubMed ID: 24962856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.
Van Sickle KR; McClusky DA; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2005 Sep; 19(9):1227-31. PubMed ID: 16025195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multi-DOF (Degree of Freedom) Articulating Laparoscopic Instrument is an Effective Device in Performing Challenging Sutures.
Min SH; Cho YS; Park K; Lee Y; Park YS; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
J Minim Invasive Surg; 2019 Dec; 22(4):157-163. PubMed ID: 35601367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Video assessment of laparoscopic skills by novices and experts: implications for surgical education.
Yeung C; Carrillo B; Pope V; Hosseinpour S; Gerstle JT; Azzie G
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):3883-3889. PubMed ID: 28205036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices.
Passerotti CC; Franco F; Bissoli JC; Tiseo B; Oliveira CM; Buchalla CA; Inoue GN; Sencan A; Sencan A; do Pardo RR; Nguyen HT
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jul; 47(7):1075-84. PubMed ID: 25913053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
