These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19344346)

  • 21. Multimedia computer-based measures of basic science and clinical skills.
    Issenberg SB; Scalese RJ
    Med Educ; 2004 May; 38(5):573-4. PubMed ID: 15107126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A change to pass/fail grading.
    Wilkinson T
    Acad Med; 2009 Dec; 84(12):1643. PubMed ID: 19940562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Our experience with repeated testing of the students' preparation by means of scanning cards.
    Novák L; Ulicný B
    Acta Univ Carol Med (Praha); 1983; 29(3-4):183-6. PubMed ID: 6637695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A trial of the objective structured practical examination in physiology at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India.
    Abraham RR; Raghavendra R; Surekha K; Asha K
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 19261756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiple choice questions in medical schools.
    Deleu D
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Nov; 21(11):1093-4; author reply 1094. PubMed ID: 11360081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A description of a Web-based educational tool for understanding the PICO framework in evidence-based practice with a citation ranking system.
    LaRue EM; Draus P; Klem ML
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2009; 27(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19060621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Learning medical ethics in a primary care clinic.
    Loh KY; Nalliah S
    Med Educ; 2008 Nov; 42(11):1127-8. PubMed ID: 18991988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of an aggregate scoring method with a consensus scoring method in a measure of clinical reasoning capacity.
    Charlin B; Desaulniers M; Gagnon R; Blouin D; van der Vleuten C
    Teach Learn Med; 2002; 14(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 12189634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptions of students towards the examination questions at the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.
    Thomas P; Hoon OP
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2008 Mar; 21(1):178. PubMed ID: 19034839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Environmental health education in the medical school curriculum.
    Roberts JR; Reigart JR
    Ambul Pediatr; 2001; 1(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 11888382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple choice questions revisited.
    Anderson J
    Med Teach; 2004 Mar; 26(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 15203517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do we need to train assessors?
    Ahmed K; Nagpal K; Ashrafian H
    Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 43(4):389. PubMed ID: 19335583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of risk communication by objective structured clinical examination.
    Joekes K; Sedgwick P; Hall A
    Med Educ; 2009 May; 43(5):484. PubMed ID: 19344344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Teaching medical history to medical students - the Monash experience.
    Wijesinha SS; Dammery D
    Aust Fam Physician; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1028-9. PubMed ID: 19142278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving students' sexual history inquiry and HIV counseling with an interactive workshop using standardized patients.
    Haist SA; Griffith III CH; Hoellein AR; Talente G; Montgomery T; Wilson JF
    J Gen Intern Med; 2004 May; 19(5 Pt 2):549-53. PubMed ID: 15109322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can peer review help the marking experience?
    Wood F; Hawthorne K; Hood K; Cannings-John R
    Med Educ; 2005 Nov; 39(11):1156-7. PubMed ID: 16262829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transforming invasive bedside procedural instruction.
    Lenchus JD; Symes S; Jaffer A; Birnbach DJ
    Med Educ; 2010 May; 44(5):522. PubMed ID: 20519004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the effectiveness of medical student teaching methods.
    McClelland SH; Baxendale BR
    Anaesthesia; 2007 May; 62(5):528-9; author reply 529. PubMed ID: 17448069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integration of written assessment is possible in a hybrid curriculum.
    Tonkin AL; Hudson JN
    Med Educ; 2001 Nov; 35(11):1072-3. PubMed ID: 11715957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Open-book tests and student-authored exam questions as useful tools to increase critical thinking.
    Vanderburgh PM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Sep; 29(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 16109800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.