BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19344355)

  • 1. Modelling evolutionary processes in small populations: not as ideal as you think.
    Waples RS; Faulkner JR
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):1834-47. PubMed ID: 19344355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
    Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
    Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative estimation of effective population sizes and temporal gene flow in two contrasting population systems.
    Fraser DJ; Hansen MM; Ostergaard S; Tessier N; Legault M; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Sep; 16(18):3866-89. PubMed ID: 17850551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolution of linkage disequilibrium of the founders in exponentially growing populations.
    Mano S
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Feb; 71(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 16908036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability of fixation under weak selection: a branching process unifying approach.
    Lambert A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Jun; 69(4):419-41. PubMed ID: 16504230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A potential bias in the temporal method for estimating Ne in admixed populations under natural selection.
    Araki H; Waples RS; Blouin MS
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jun; 16(11):2261-71. PubMed ID: 17561889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
    Barton NH; Turelli M
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for missing data in the estimation of contemporary genetic effective population size (N(e) ).
    Peel D; Waples RS; Macbeth GM; Do C; Ovenden JR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Mar; 13(2):243-53. PubMed ID: 23280157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic effective size, N(e), tracks density in a small freshwater cyprinid, Pecos bluntnose shiner (Notropis simus pecosensis).
    Osborne MJ; Davenport SR; Hoagstrom CW; Turner TF
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Jul; 19(14):2832-44. PubMed ID: 20579288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?
    Waples RS
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Oct; 14(11):3335-52. PubMed ID: 16156807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quasi-equilibrium theory for the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population: justification and implications.
    Burr TL
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 May; 57(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 10828221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity.
    Waples RS; Gaggiotti O
    Mol Ecol; 2006 May; 15(6):1419-39. PubMed ID: 16629801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review on Monte Carlo simulation methods as they apply to mutation and selection as formulated in Wright-Fisher models of evolutionary genetics.
    Mode CJ; Gallop RJ
    Math Biosci; 2008 Feb; 211(2):205-25. PubMed ID: 18190932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective population sizes and migration rates in fragmented populations of an endangered insect (Coenagrion mercuriale: Odonata).
    Watts PC; Saccheri IJ; Kemp SJ; Thompson DJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):790-800. PubMed ID: 17584385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling evolving populations.
    Prügel-Bennett A
    J Theor Biol; 1997 Mar; 185(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 9093555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Premeiotic clusters of mutation and the cost of natural selection.
    Woodruff RC; Thompson JN; Gu S
    J Hered; 2004; 95(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 15247306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective population size associated with self-fertilization: lessons from temporal changes in allele frequencies in the selfing annual Medicago truncatula.
    Siol M; Bonnin I; Olivieri I; Prosperi JM; Ronfort J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2349-60. PubMed ID: 17956396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fate of balanced, phenotypic polymorphisms in fragmented metapopulations.
    Craze PG
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jul; 22(7):1556-61. PubMed ID: 19486237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variable patterns of introgression in two sculpin hybrid zones suggest that genomic isolation differs among populations.
    Nolte AW; Gompert Z; Buerkle CA
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jun; 18(12):2615-27. PubMed ID: 19457191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.