197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19344527)
1. Brachytherapy for cervix cancer: low-dose rate or high-dose rate brachytherapy - a meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Viani GA; Manta GB; Stefano EJ; de Fendi LI
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Apr; 28(1):47. PubMed ID: 19344527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High dose rate versus low dose rate intracavity brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervix cancer.
Wang X; Liu R; Ma B; Yang K; Tian J; Jiang L; Bai ZG; Hao XY; Wang J; Li J; Sun SL; Yin H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jul; (7):CD007563. PubMed ID: 20614461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High dose rate versus low dose rate intracavity brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervix cancer.
Liu R; Wang X; Tian JH; Yang K; Wang J; Jiang L; Hao XY
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD007563. PubMed ID: 25300170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of low and high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Retrospective analysis of two sequential series.
Ferrigno R; Nishimoto IN; Novaes PE; Pellizzon AC; Maia MA; Fogarolli RC; Salvajoli JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1108-16. PubMed ID: 15990016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) experience.
Falkenberg E; Kim RY; Meleth S; De Los Santos J; Spencer S
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16563997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: analysis of tumor recurrence--the University of Wisconsin experience.
Petereit DG; Sarkaria JN; Potter DM; Schink JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1267-74. PubMed ID: 10613322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High versus low dose rate intracavitary irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kim WC; Kim GE; Suh CO; Loh JJ
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2001 Sep; 31(9):432-7. PubMed ID: 11689597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phase III randomized trial comparing LDR and HDR brachytherapy in treatment of cervical carcinoma.
Lertsanguansinchai P; Lertbutsayanukul C; Shotelersuk K; Khorprasert C; Rojpornpradit P; Chottetanaprasith T; Srisuthep A; Suriyapee S; Jumpangern C; Tresukosol D; Charoonsantikul C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Aug; 59(5):1424-31. PubMed ID: 15275728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the efficacy and complication rates of low dose-rate versus high dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Sarkaria JN; Petereit DG; Stitt JA; Hartman T; Chappell R; Thomadsen BR; Buchler DA; Fowler JF; Kinsella TJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Aug; 30(1):75-82; discussion 247. PubMed ID: 8083131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biologically effective doses in medium dose rate brachytherapy of cancer of the cervix.
Leborgne F; Fowler JF; Leborgne JH; Zubizarreta E; Chappell R
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1997; 5(6):289-99. PubMed ID: 9436246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate intracavitary therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a randomized trial.
Hareyama M; Sakata K; Oouchi A; Nagakura H; Shido M; Someya M; Koito K
Cancer; 2002 Jan; 94(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 11815967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-dose-rate vs. low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee KK; Lee JY; Nam JM; Kim CB; Park KR
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 25906951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HDR and MDR intracavitary treatment for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A prospective randomized study.
el-Baradie M; Inoue T; Inoue T; Murayama S; Tang JT; Yamazaki H; Fournier-Bidoz N
Strahlenther Onkol; 1997 Mar; 173(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 9122857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer: Comparison of LDR and HDR brachytherapy.
Lin AJ; Samson P; Zoberi J; Garcia-Ramirez J; Williamson JF; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Grigsby PW
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):353-360. PubMed ID: 30971370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective study of HDR (192Ir) versus MDR (137Cs) intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Tanaka E; Oh RJ; Yamada Y; Shiomi H; Nakamura S; Shimamoto S; Teshima T; Inoue T; Inoue T
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15062145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High dose rate versus low dose rate brachytherapy for oral cancer--a meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Liu Z; Huang S; Zhang D
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65423. PubMed ID: 23762369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results and complications of high dose rate and low dose rate brachytherapy in carcinoma of the cervix: Cerrahpaşa experience.
Okkan S; Atkovar G; Sahinler I; Oner Dinçbaş F; Koca A; Köksal S; Turkan S; Uzel R
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Apr; 67(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 12758245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-dose versus low-dose rate brachytherapy in definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
Kucera H; Pötter R; Knocke TH; Baldass M; Kucera E
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Jan; 113(1-2):58-62. PubMed ID: 11233470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current controversies in high-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Stewart AJ; Viswanathan AN
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(5):908-15. PubMed ID: 16874815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transition from LDR to HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Evaluation of tumor control, survival, and toxicity.
Romano KD; Pugh KJ; Trifiletti DM; Libby B; Showalter TN
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(2):378-386. PubMed ID: 28139420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
